green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1958 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1958
1992
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Calcutti v. SBU, INC.
(2×)
See Vigilant Insurance v. Housing Authority of El Paso, 87 N.Y.2d 36 , 637 N.Y.S.2d 342 , 660 N.E.2d 1121, 1126 (1995) (citing Sporn v. MCA Records, 58 N.Y.2d 482 , 462 N.Y.S.2d 413 , 448 N.E.2d 1324, 1327 (1983) and Varga v. Credit-Suisse, 5 A.D.2d 289, 171 N.Y.S.2d 674 , aff'd, 5 N.Y.2d 865, 182 N.Y.S.2d 17 , 155 N.E.2d 865 (1958)).
discussed
Cited "see"
DeWeerth v. Baldinger
(2×)
See Varga v. Credit-Suisse, 5 A.D.2d 289, 291-92 , 171 N.Y.S.2d 674, 677-78 (1st Dep’t), aff'd, 5 N.Y.2d 865 , 182 N.Y.S.2d 17 , 155 N.E.2d 865 (1958); Two Clinton Square Corp. v. Friedler, 91 A.D.2d 1193, 1194 , 459 N.Y.S.2d 179, 181 (4th Dep’t 1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gerda Dorothea Deweerth v. Edith Marks Baldinger, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Wildenstein & Co., Inc., Third-Party-Defendant-Appellant
(2×)
See Varga v. Credit-Suisse, 5 A.D.2d 289, 291-92 , 171 N.Y.S.2d 674, 677-78 (1st Dep't), aff'd, 5 N.Y.2d 865 , 182 N.Y.S.2d 17 , 155 N.E.2d 865 (1958); Two Clinton Square Corp. v. Friedler, 91 A.D.2d 1193, 1194 , 459 N.Y.S.2d 179, 181 (4th Dep't 1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Fire Insurance v. North Shore Risk Management
Accordingly, that portion of North Shore’s motion requesting leave to file a motion for summary judgment asserting a statute of limitations defense should be affirmed solely as to US Fire’s breach of contract claim (see Lamendola v Mossa, 190 Misc 2d 147, 149 [App Term, 2d Dept 2001], citing Ely-Cruikshank Co. v Bank of Montreal, 81 NY2d 399 [1993]; see also Varga v Credit-Suisse, 5 AD2d 289, 292 [1st Dept 1958], affd 5 NY2d 865 [1958]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States Fire Insurance v. North Shore Risk Management
Accordingly, that portion of North Shore’s motion requesting leave to file a motion for summary judgment asserting a statute of limitations defense should be affirmed solely as to US Fire’s breach of contract claim (see Lamendola v Mossa, 190 Misc 2d 147, 149 [App Term, 2d Dept 2001], citing Ely-Cruikshank Co. v Bank of Montreal, 81 NY2d 399 [1993]; see also Varga v Credit-Suisse, 5 AD2d 289, 292 [1st Dept 1958], affd 5 NY2d 865 [1958]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Keil v. National Westminster Bank, Inc.
In New York, however, the cause of action would be deemed to have accrued on “the date of the bank’s ... improper payment and not on the subsequent date when [the plaintiff] received knowledge of defendant’s alleged breach.” Gonzalez v. Anchor Bank Corp., 666 N.Y.S.2d 151, 152 (App.Div.1997); see also Varga v. Credit-Suisse, 5 AD.2d 289, 292, 171 N.Y.S.2d 674, 677 (App.Div.), aff'd, 5 N.F.2d 865, 182 N.Y.S.2d 17 , 155 N.E.2d 865 (1958); Bollag v. National City Bank of New York, 225 AD. 218, 220, 232 N.Y.S. 498, 500-01 (App.Div.1929).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bela Varga, Individually and as President of the National Hungarian Government, on Behalf of Himself and All Those Beneficiaries of the National Hungarian Trust Fund Similarly Situated, Appellant,
v.
Credit Suisse, Respondent.
v.
Credit Suisse, Respondent.
New York Court of Appeals.
Nov 21, 1958.
Cited by 14 opinions | Published
Michael M. Platzman for appellant.
William Eldred Jackson and Rebecca M. Cutler for respondent.
Concur: Chief Judge CONWAY and Judges DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.