green
Positive treatment
3.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993
2009
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Whalen v. Kawasaki Motors Corp.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Moreover, the possibility of double recovery should be avoided (see, Williams v Niske, supra, 81 NY2d, at 442-444 ; accord, Dudick v Keene Corp., 82 NY2d 821 , affg for reasons stated at 188 AD2d 214, 218 ; Didner v Keene Corp., 82 NY2d 342, 351 ; Pollicina v Misericordia Hosp.
examined
Cited "see"
In Re Joint E. & S. Dist. Asbestos Litigation
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See In re New York City Asbestos Litig., 151 Misc.2d 1 , 572 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1010 (Sup.Ct.1991) (bankrupt's shares allocated to both settled and non-settled tortfeasors), aff'd as modified in part, and reversed in part, 188 A.D.2d 214 , 593 N.Y.S.2d 43 (App.Div. 1st Dep't 1993) (non-settling tortfeasors only), aff'd, 82 N.Y.2d 821 , 605 N.Y.S.2d 3 , 625 N.E.2d 588 (1993) (non-settling tortfeasors only); In re E. & S. Dist.
examined
Cited "see"
Findley v. Falise
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See In re New York City Asbestos Litig., 151 Misc.2d 1 , 572 N.Y.S.2d 1006, 1010 (Sup.Ct.1991), (bankrupt’s shares allocated to both settled and non-settled tortfeasors), aff'd as modified in part, and reversed in part, 188 A.D.2d 214 , 593 N.Y.S.2d 43 (App.Div. 1st Dep’t 1993) (non-settling tortfeasors only), aff'd, 82 N.Y.2d 821 , 605 N.Y.S.2d 3 , 625 N.E.2d 588 (1993) (non-settling tortfeasors only); In re E. & S. Dist.
examined
Cited "see"
In Re New York Asbestos Litigation
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See 82 N.Y.2d 821 , 605 N.Y.S.2d 3 , 625 N.E.2d 588 (1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation (Brooklyn Naval Shipyard Cases). Genevieve Dudick, Individually and as Administratrix of the Estate of Greska Dudick, Deceased, Et Al., Respondents,
v.
Keene Corporation, Appellant. (And Other Actions.)
v.
Keene Corporation, Appellant. (And Other Actions.)
New York Court of Appeals.
Nov 18, 1993.
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, McCarter & English (Andrew T. Berry, Richard P. O’Leary and Kevin J. Connell of counsel, of the New Jersey Bar, admitted pro hac vice), for appellant., Levy Phillips & Konigsberg, New York City (Steven J. Phillips, Alani Golanski and Jerry Kristal of counsel), and Greitzer & Locks, of the Pennsylvania Bar, admitted pro hac vice, for respondents.
Cited by 11 opinions | Published
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Israel Rubin at the Appellate Division (188 AD2d 214; see, Didner v Keene Corp., 82 NY2d 342 [decided today]; Pollicina v Misericordia Hosp. Med. Ctr., 82 NY2d 332 [decided today]).
[*825] Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa, Smith and Levine.