green
Positive treatment
7.1 score
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Auchampaugh v. Syracuse University
The hazards contemplated by Labor Law § 240 (I) involve those “related to the effects of gravity where protective devices are called for . . . because of a difference between the elevation level of the required work and a lower level” (Rocovich v Consolidated Edison Co., 78 NY2d 509, 514 [1991]; accord Grant v Reconstruction Home, 267 AD2d 555, 556 [1999], appeal dismissed 95 NY2d 831 [2000], lv dismissed 95 NY2d 825 [2000]).
examined
Cited "see"
Hamblet v. Brownlee
(3×)
See Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. BDO Seidman, LLP, 222 F.3d 63, 68 (2d Cir.2000), certified question accepted by 95 N.Y.2d 831 , 712 N.Y.S.2d 910 , 734 N.E.2d 1211 (2000). 2.
examined
Cited "see"
Starkey Ex Rel. Starkey v. Somers Central School Dist.
(3×)
See Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. EDO Seidman, LLP, 222 F.3d 63, 68 (2d Cir.2000), certified question accepted by 95 N.Y.2d 831 , 712 N.Y.S.2d 910 , 734 N.E.2d 1211 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nancy Sweet v. Robert Sheahan
(2×)
See Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. BDO Seidman, LLP, 222 F.3d 63, 68 (2d Cir. 2000), certified question accepted by 95 N.Y.2d 831 , 734 N.E.2d 1211 (N.Y. 2000).
examined
Cited "see"
Sweet v. Sheahan
(3×)
See Securities Investor Protection Corp. v. BDO Seidman, LLP, 222 F.3d 63, 68 (2d Cir.2000), certified question accepted by 95 N.Y.2d 831 , 712 N.Y.S.2d 910 , 734 N.E.2d 1211 (N.Y.2000).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Securities Investor Protection Corporation
v.
BDO Seidman, L. L. P.
v.
BDO Seidman, L. L. P.
New York Court of Appeals.
Jun 29, 2000.
734 N.E.2d 1211
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt.