People v. Fields, 912 N.E.2d 1077 (NY 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Fields, 912 N.E.2d 1077 (NY 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
109 citation events (109 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Pizarro (nyappdiv, 2020-07-02)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. Pizarro
N.Y. App. Div. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
In our view, the Center's report that excluded defendant's DNA only from the inside of the window frame does not "directly or expressly provide evidence favorable to defendant by negating or placing in doubt his criminal acts" so as to warrant the withdrawal of his plea ( People v Fisher , 28 NY3d 717, 722 [2017]; see People v First , 62 AD3d 1043, 1044 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 915 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" GARCIA, DWAYNE D., PEOPLE v
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
With respect to one of the prospective jurors, defendant failed to present “facts and other relevant circumstances sufficient to raise an inference that the prosecution used its peremptory challenge[] to exclude [the] potential juror because of [her] race” (People v Childress, 81 NY2d 263, 266 ; see People v Green, 60 AD3d 1320, 1321 , lv denied 12 NY3d 915 ).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Garcia
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
With respect to one of the prospective jurors, defendant failed to present “facts and other relevant circumstances sufficient to raise an inference that the prosecution used its peremptory challenge [ ] to exclude [the] potential juror because of [her] race” (People v Childress, 81 NY2d 263, 266 [1993]; see People v Green, 60 AD3d 1320, 1321 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 915 [2009]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Garcia
N.Y. App. Div. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
With respect to one of the prospective jurors, defendant failed to present “facts and other relevant circumstances sufficient to raise an inference that the prosecution used its peremptory challenge [ ] to exclude [the] potential juror because of [her] race” (People v Childress, 81 NY2d 263, 266 [1993]; see People v Green, 60 AD3d 1320, 1321 [2009], lv denied 12 NY3d 915 [2009]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
FIELDS.
New York Court of Appeals.
Jun 30, 2009.
912 N.E.2d 1077
Published

Application in criminal case for leave to appeal denied. (Ciparick, J.).