People v. Ellison, 818 N.E.2d 675 (NY 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Ellison, 818 N.E.2d 675 (NY 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
39 citation events (39 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Lipton (nyappdiv, 2025-05-02)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" People v. Lipton
N.Y. App. Div. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
Here, while being interrogated at the police station, defendant stated to the investigators six separate times that she had "nothing else to . . . say" and that she was "done talking." Even if defendant's initial statement that she had nothing else to say may have been prompted by her "unwillingness to change [her] story" ( People v Lowin , 36 AD3d 1153, 1155 [3d Dept 2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 847 [2007], reconsideration denied 9 NY3d 878 [2007]; see People v Czternastek , 174 AD3d 1522 , 1522-1523 [4th Dept 2019], lv denied 34 NY3d 950 [2019]), she repeated her desire to stop talking even after…
discussed Cited "see" People v. Sims
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
Given that the arresting officer, upon grabbing defendant’s hand, touched an object through defendant’s pocket that he believed to be a small handgun, “the officer did not act unlawfully in reaching into the pocket and removing the object” (Bracy, 91 AD3d at 1298 ; see People v Davenport, 9 AD3d 316, 316 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 705 [2004]).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Sims
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
Given that the arresting officer, upon grabbing defendant’s hand, touched an object through defendant’s pocket that he believed to be a small handgun, “the officer did not act unlawfully in reaching into the pocket and removing the object” (Bracy, 91 AD3d at 1298 ; see People v Davenport, 9 AD3d 316, 316 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 705 [2004]).
discussed Cited "see" SIMS, QUENTIN A., PEOPLE v
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
Given that the arresting officer, upon grabbing defendant’s hand, touched an object through defendant’s pocket that he believed to be a small handgun, “the officer did not act unlawfully in reaching into the pocket and removing the object” (Bracy, 91 AD3d at 1298 ; see People v Davenport, 9 AD3d 316, 316 , lv denied 3 NY3d 705 ).
discussed Cited "see" People v. Reid
N.Y. App. Div. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
The police investigator questioned defendant about his family and other subjects but returned to questions regarding the alleged crime without again advising defendant of his Miranda rights and therefore failed to “scrupulously honor[ ]” defendant’s right to remain silent (Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436, 479 [1966]; see People v Douglas, 8 AD3d 980 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 705 [2004]; People v Brown, 266 AD2d 838 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 860 [1999]; cf. People v Cox, 21 AD3d 1361, 1363 [2005], lv denied 6 NY3d 753 [2005]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PEOPLE
v.
ELLISON
New York Court of Appeals.
Sep 2, 2004.
818 N.E.2d 675
Published

Application in criminal case for leave to appeal—Denied. (Graffeo, J.)