green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005
2015
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
O'Dell v. County of Livingston
"The 90-day period . . . for serving a notice of claim on a municipality in an action for false arrest commences the day that the claimant is released from custody" ( Hines v City of Buffalo , 79 AD2d 218, 225 [4th Dept 1981]; see Santiago v City of Rochester , 19 AD3d 1061, 1061-1062 [4th Dept 2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 710 [2005]).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re the Estate of Peters
As a preliminary matter, we note that the appeal from the order in appeal No. 1 “must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the decreets] in the proceeding” (Matter of Winters, 84 AD3d 1388, 1388 [2011]; see Matter of Beiny, 16 AD3d 221, 222 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 710 [2005]).
discussed
Cited "see"
THOMPSON, COREEN N., MTR. OF
As a preliminary matter, we note that the appeal from the order in appeal No. 1 “must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the decree[s] in the proceeding” (Matter of Winters, 84 AD3d 1388, 1388 ; see Matter of Beiny, 16 AD3d 221, 222 , lv denied 5 NY3d 710 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re the Estate of Peters
As a preliminary matter, we note that the appeal from the order in appeal No. 1 “must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the decreets] in the proceeding” (Matter of Winters, 84 AD3d 1388, 1388 [2011]; see Matter of Beiny, 16 AD3d 221, 222 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 710 [2005]).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Lashway
While the sentencing court, of course, “is not bound by the recommendation of the Board and, in the exercise of its discretion, may depart from that recommendation and determine the sex offender’s risk level based upon the facts and circumstances that appear in the record” (Matter of New York State Bd. of Examiners of Sex Offenders v Ransom, 249 AD2d 891, 891-892 [1998]; see People v Douglas, 18 AD3d 967, 968 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 710 [2005]), in practice, the Board’s recommendation is often among the most influential factors considered by a sentencing court in making its classifica…
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Lashway
While the sentencing court, of course, “is not bound by the recommendation of the Board and, in the exercise of its discretion, may depart from that recommendation and determine the sex offender’s risk level based upon the facts and circumstances that appear in the record” (Matter of New York State Bd. of Examiners of Sex Offenders v Ransom, 249 AD2d 891, 891-892 [1998]; see People v Douglas, 18 AD3d 967, 968 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 710 [2005]), in practice, the Board’s recommendation is often among the most influential factors considered by a sentencing court in making its classifica…
discussed
Cited "see"
Rockland County Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. Prendergast
The RCPA is a “special act which takes precedence over inconsistent provisions of the Civil Service Law” (Matter of Burbridge v Miele, 214 AD2d 669, 670 [1995]; see Matter of Town of Orangetown v Orangetown Policemen's Benevolent Assn., 18 AD3d 879, 880-881 [2005], lv granted 5 NY3d 710 [2005]; Matter of Steinmann v Village of Spring Val., 261 AD2d 548, 549 [1999]) and “was intended to supersede any general statute with regard to the establishment, organization and operation of police departments in Rockland County” (Matter of Rockland County Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. v Town of Rama…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Matter of Leonidez A. v. Sira L.R.
By contrast, the father has been more of a hands-on parent, who spent as much time as he could with the child, and relied on family or caregivers as little as possible ( see id. at 428 ; see also John A. v Bridget M. , 16 AD3d 324, 335 [1st Dept 2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 710 [2005]).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Poblocki v. Todoro
Corp., 245 AD2d 174, 175 [1997]; Bartha v Lombardo & Assoc., 212 AD2d 494 [1995]; see also Sawczyn v Red Roof Inns, Inc., 15 AD3d 851, 852 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 710 [2005]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
FARRAGO
v.
GREAT ATL. & PAC. TEA CO., INC.
v.
GREAT ATL. & PAC. TEA CO., INC.
Published
Motion for leave to appeal denied.