Todem Homes, Inc. v. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 419 N.E.2d 1078 (NY 1981). · Go Syfert
Search
Todem Homes, Inc. v. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 419 N.E.2d 1078 (NY 1981). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 12 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ellis National Bank v. Irving Trust Co. (ca2, 1986-03-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Ellis National Bank v. Irving Trust Co. (2×)
2d Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vink, 549 F.Supp. at 272 (noting that Helmsley-Spear, Inc. v. Winter, 74 A.D.2d 195 , 426 N.Y.S.2d 778, 780 (1980), aff'd, 52 N.Y.2d 984 , 419 N.E.2d 1078 , 438 N.Y.S.2d 79 (1981) disapproved “the one case [then] at all on point” in favor of the theft or fraud exception, National Bank of N. Am. v. International Bhd. of Elec.
discussed Cited "see" Ellis National Bank Of Jacksonville v. Irving Trust Company (2×)
2d Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Vink, 549 F.Supp. at 272 (noting that Helmsley-Spear, Inc. v. Winter, 74 A.D.2d 195 , 426 N.Y.S.2d 778, 780 (1980), aff'd, 52 N.Y.2d 984 , 419 N.E.2d 1078 , 438 N.Y.S.2d 79 (1981) disapproved "the one case [then] at all on point" in favor of the theft or fraud exception, National Bank of N. Am. v. International Bhd. of Elec.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Schoonmaker Homes—John Steinberg, Inc. v. Village of Maybrook
N.Y. App. Div. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
In particular, vested rights were extended to existing and in-progress structures and developments, but were not extended to new, additional or different structures and developments (see, Matter of Rogers v Department of Hous. & Bldgs., 5 AD2d 784, 785; see also, Matter of Todem Homes v Board of Zoning Appeals, 74 AD2d 908 , affd 52 NY2d 972 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Tyler v. Putman (In Re Putman) (2×)
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 1990 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Helmsley-Spear, Inc., v. Winter, 74 A.D.2d 195 , 426 N.Y.S.2d 778 (1980), aff'd, 52 N.Y.2d 984 , 438 N.Y.S.2d 79 , 419 N.E.2d 1078 (1981). 29 In addition, we take note of, but do not base our decision on, the New York legislature’s recent enactment of Chapter 280 of the 1989 laws.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Aronsohn & Springstead v. Weissman (2×)
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Helmsley-Spear, Inc. v. Winter, 74 A.D. 2d 195 , 426 N.Y.S. 2d 778 (1980), aff'd o.b. 52 N.Y. 2d 984 , 438 N.Y.S. 2d 79 , 419 N.E. 2d 1078 (Ct.App. 1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Todem Homes, Inc.
v.
Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Southampton
New York Court of Appeals.
Feb 17, 1981.
419 N.E.2d 1078
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Israel G. Seeger for appellant., Richard E. De Petris for respondents.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (74 AD2d 908).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Judge Fuchsberg dissents and votes to reverse for reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice William R. Geiler at Supreme Court, Suffolk County.