Jou-Jou Designs, Inc. v. Int'l Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Local 23-25, 459 N.E.2d 861 (NY 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Jou-Jou Designs, Inc. v. Int'l Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Local 23-25, 459 N.E.2d 861 (NY 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wolf Street Supermarkets, Inc. v. McPartland (nyappdiv, 1985-04-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Wolf Street Supermarkets, Inc. v. McPartland
N.Y. App. Div. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
Workers, 744 F2d 521; Billy Jack For Her v New York Coat, Suit, Dress, Rainwear & Allied Workers’ Union, 511 F Supp 1180 [applying New York law]; see also, Jou-Jou Designs v International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, 94 AD2d 395 , affd 60 NY2d 1011 ). 3 In our view, plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case that the sporadic and isolated incidents of harassment which occurred during the first few days of the picketing, and which were attributable for the most part only to the defendant McPartland, resulted in any damage to its business.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jou-Jou Designs, Inc.
v.
International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Local 23-25
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 1, 1983.
459 N.E.2d 861
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Herman E. Cooper and Barry H. Singer for appellant., Stanley L. Goodman and Eric B. Chaikin for respondent.
Jasen.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Fritz W. Alexander at the Appellate Division (94 AD2d 395).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye. Judge Jasen concurs in a concurring memorandum.

Concurrence

Jasen, J.

(concurring). While I agree that the complaint should be dismissed because plaintiff has failed effectively to allege illegal activity falling within State court jurisdiction, I hasten to add that in the proper case, even without compliance with section 807 of the Labor Law, the courts of this State may provide compensatory damage relief for violence or threats of violence albeit incident to a labor dispute. The “ ‘[pjolicing of * * * conduct’ which consists of ‘actual or threatened violence to persons or destruction of property,’ is left to the States.” (San Diego Unions v Garmon, 359 US 236, 248, n 6, quoting International Union v Wisconsin Bd., 336 US 245, 253; Automobile Workers v Russell, 356 US 634, 638.)

Order affirmed, etc.