Innes v. Cnty. of Genesee, 465 N.E.2d 1262 (NY 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Innes v. Cnty. of Genesee, 465 N.E.2d 1262 (NY 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Santana Products, Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc. (pamd, 1999-08-30) · Strongest negative: Caselli v. City of New York (nyappdiv, 1984-12-31)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Caselli v. City of New York
N.Y. App. Div. · 1984 · signal: but see · confidence high
We held that a police accident report and a line-of-duty injury report filed soon after the accident did not furnish the city with either actual or constructive notice of plaintiff’s claim of negligence on the part of the city; both reports merely described the collision between the two vehicles and made no connection between the accident and the oil spill (see, also, Figueroa v City of New York, 92 AD2d 908 ; but see Innes v County of Genesee, 99 AD2d 642 , affd 62 NY2d 779 ).
discussed Cited "see" Santana Products, Inc. v. Bobrick Washroom Equipment, Inc.
M.D. Penn. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mead v. Bloom, 94 A.D.2d 423, 425-26 , 464 N.Y.S.2d 904 (App.Div. 1983), aff'd, 62 N.Y.2d 788 , 477 N.Y.S.2d 326 , 465 N.E.2d 1262 (1984). 9 The non-settling party is also relieved of any liability for contribution to the settling party.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Andrulonis v. United States
N.D.N.Y. · 1989 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Mead v. Bloom, 94 A.D.2d 423, 425-26 , 464 N.Y.S.2d 904, 906 (4th Dept.1983), aff'd, 62 N.Y.2d 788 , 477 N.Y.S.2d 326 , 465 N.E.2d 1262 (1984). [651] On February 14, 1987, a settlement agreement between plaintiffs and the WARF defendants was reached.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John F. Innes, III, Respondent,
v.
County of Genesee Et Al., Appellants
New York Court of Appeals.
May 17, 1984.
465 N.E.2d 1262
Paul J. Yesawich, III, for appellants., Judry L. Subar for respondent.
Cooke, Jasen, Jones, Kaye, Meyer, Simons, Wachtler.
Cited by 9 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. We find no error of law in the determination of the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.