Farm Stores, Inc. v. Sch. Feeding Corp., 479 N.E.2d 222 (NY 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Farm Stores, Inc. v. Sch. Feeding Corp., 479 N.E.2d 222 (NY 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · …preferential transfers to directors, officers and shareholders of insolvent corporations in derogation of the rights of general creditors do not fulfill the good faith requirement of the debtor and creditor law. ⚠ not in text
79 citation events (35 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Priestley v. Panmedix Inc. (nysd, 2014-05-01)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Priestley v. Panmedix Inc. (3×)
S.D.N.Y. · 2014 · quote attribution · 3 verbatim quotes · confidence low
preferential transfers to directors, officers and shareholders of insolvent corporations in derogation of the rights of general creditors do not fulfill the good faith requirement of the debtor and creditor law.
examined Cited "see" Pashaian v. Eccelston Properties, Ltd. (3×)
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Farm Stores, Inc. v. School Feeding Corp., 102 A.D.2d 249 , 477 N.Y.S.2d 374, 378 (1984), aff'd, 64 N.Y.2d 1065 , 489 N.Y.S.2d 877 , 479 N.E.2d 222 (1985); Southern Industries, Inc. v. Jeremias, 66 A.D.2d 178 , 411 N.Y.S.2d 945, 949 (1978). 44 HBE Leasing Corp., 48 F.3d at 634-35 ; see also Atlanta Shipping Corp. v. Chemical Bank, 818 F.2d 240, 249 (2d Cir.1987) ("In general, repayment of an antecedent debt constitutes fair consideration unless the transferee is an officer, director, or major shareholder of the transferor."); Laco X-Ray Sys., Inc. v. Fingerhut, 88 A.D.2d 425, 433 , 453 N.Y…
examined Cited "see" Pashaian v. Eccelston Properties, Ltd. (3×)
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Farm Stores, Inc. v. School Feeding Corp., 102 A.D.2d 249 , 477 N.Y.S.2d 374, 378 (1984), ajfd, 64 N.Y.2d 1065 , 489 N.Y.S.2d 877 , 479 N.E.2d 222 (1985); Southern Industries, Inc. v. Jeremías, 66 A.D.2d 178 , 411 N.Y.S.2d 945, 949 (1978).
examined Cited "see" Hbe Leasing Corporation v. Frank (3×)
2d Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Farm Stores, Inc. v. School Feeding Corp., 102 A.D.2d 249 , 477 N.Y.S.2d 374, 378 (1984), aff'd, 64 N.Y.2d 1065 , 489 N.Y.S.2d 877 , 479 N.E.2d 222 (1985); Southern Industries, Inc. v. Jeremias, 66 A.D.2d 178 , 411 N.Y.S.2d 945, 949 (1978).
examined Cited "see" HBE Leasing Corp. v. Frank (3×)
2d Cir. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Farm Stores, Inc. v. School Feeding Corp., 102 A.D.2d 249 , 477 N.Y.S.2d 374, 378 (1984), aff'd, 64 N.Y.2d 1065 , 489 N.Y.S.2d 877 , 479 N.E.2d 222 (1985); Southern Industries, Inc. v. Jeremias, 66 A.D.2d 178 , 411 N.Y.S.2d 945, 949 (1978).
discussed Cited "see" Marine Midland Bank v. Murkoff
N.Y. App. Div. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
To recover attorneys’ fees under Debtor and Creditor Law § 276-a, actual intent to hinder, delay or defraud must be established (Debtor and Creditor Law § 276-a; see, Farm Stores v School Feeding Corp., 102 AD2d 249, 256, 257 , affd 64 NY2d 1065 on opn at App Div; Schmitt v Morgan, 98 AD2d 934, 936 , appeal dismissed 62 NY2d 914 ; Southern Indus. v Jeremias, 66 AD2d 178, 185-186 ).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." City of Yonkers v. Otis Elevator Co. (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Manhattan Theatre Club, Inc. v. Bohemian Benevolent and Literary Ass'n., 64 N.Y.2d 1069 , 479 N.E.2d 222 , 489 N.Y.S.2d 877 (1985); Hotchkiss v. National City Bank, 200 Fed. 287, 293 (S.D.N.Y.1911), aff’d, 201 Fed. 664 (2d Cir.1912), aff'd, 231 U.S. 50 , 34 S.Ct. 20 , 58 L.Ed. 115 (1913). 22 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Farm Stores, Inc.
v.
School Feeding Corp.
New York Court of Appeals.
Apr 23, 1985.
479 N.E.2d 222
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Irving Levine for appellant., Hannah K. Flamenbaum and Donald N. David for respondents.
Cited by 37 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 81%
Citer courts: S.D. New York (3)

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum. •

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as it modified and, as so modified, affirmed the judgment of Supreme Court entered September 28,1982, should be affirmed for the reasons stated in[*1067] the opinion by Justice Moses M. Weinstein (102 AD2d 249). We add only that the order of Supreme Court entered January 18, 1983, merely recognized that a statutory stay of the September 28,1982judgment was in effect pursuant to CPLR 5519 (a) (2) in favor of respondent Lifton, and thus vacated the entry of the money judgment against Lifton. As such, this order merely administered the course of the litigation and, therefore, petitioner’s appeal from the Appellate Division order insofar as it affirmed this order should be dismissed for nonfinality.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur.

Order affirmed, with costs, insofar as it modified and, as so modified, affirmed the judgment of Supreme Court entered September 28, 1982; and appeal from so much of the order as affirmed the order of Supreme Court entered January 18, 1983 dismissed in a memorandum.