Citigifts, Inc. v. Pechnik, 491 N.E.2d 1100 (NY 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Citigifts, Inc. v. Pechnik, 491 N.E.2d 1100 (NY 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
45 citation events (26 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Columna v. Gomez (nysd, 2022-03-14)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Columna v. Gomez
S.D.N.Y. · 2022 · confidence medium
Dist., 67 N.Y.2d 775, 775 , 500 N.Y.S.2d 643, 643 , 491 N.E.2d 1100, 1100 (1986)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Jones v. City Of New York
S.D.N.Y. · 2021 · confidence medium
Dist., 67 N.Y.2d 775, 775 , 500 N.Y.S.2d 643, 643 , 491 N.E.2d 1100, 1100 (1986).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Warberg Opportunistic Trading Fund L.P. v. GeoResources, Inc.
N.Y. App. Div. · 2017 · confidence medium
We reject defendant’s position that, at least for three of the seven Warberg/OOC transactions, the assignment was limited by language stating that the warrants were being conveyed “free and clear of all claims.” That language does not limit the rights and benefits the buyers bargained for by stripping them of claims to protect those rights, but, in fact, protects the buyers by making clear that they were purchasing the warrants unencumbered by any claims with respect to title, such as competing “security interests, liens, pledges, claims (pending or threatened), charges, escrows.” Th…
cited Cited "see" Downstate at Lich Holding Co., Inc. v. Fortis Prop. Group, LLC
N.Y. Sup. Albany · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
Corp. , 100 AD2d 865, 867 [2d Dept 1984] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted], affd 64 NY2d 930 [1985]; see Citigifts, Inc. v Pechnik , 67 NY2d 774, 775 [1986]).
cited Cited "see" Downstate at Lich Holding Co., Inc. v. Fortis Prop. Group, LLC
N.Y. Sup. Albany · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
Corp. , 100 AD2d 865, 867 [2d Dept 1984] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted], affd 64 NY2d 930 [1985]; see Citigifts, Inc. v Pechnik , 67 NY2d 774, 775 [1986]).
examined Cited "see" Kreiss v. McCown De Leeuw & Co. (3×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Health-Chem Corp. v. Baker, 915 F.2d 805, 811 (2d Cir.1990) (“When the parties to a contract enter into a new agreement that expressly supersedes the previous agreement, the previous agreement is extinguished, thereby reducing the remedy for breach to a suit on the new agreement.”) (citing Citigifts, Inc. v. Pechnik, 112 A.D.2d 832 , 492 N.Y.S.2d 752 (1st Dep’t 1985), aff'd mem., 67 N.Y.2d 774 , 500 N.Y.S.2d 643 , 491 N.E.2d 1100 (1986)).
examined Cited "see" Wigton v. Rosenthall (3×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Citigifts, Inc., v. Pechnik, 112 A.D.2d 832 , 492 N.Y.S.2d 752 (App.Div.1985), aff'd, 67 N.Y.2d 774 , 500 N.Y.S.2d 643 , 491 N.E.2d 1100 (1986); Salo Landscape & Constr.
discussed Cited "see" American Telephone & Telegraph Co v. New York City Department of Human Resources (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murray v. LeRoy Central School District, 67 N.Y.2d 775 , 500 N.Y.S.2d 643 , 491 N.E.2d 1100 (1986) (applying § 3813 of the Education Law); Chinatown Apartments, Inc. v. New York City Transit Authority, 100 A.D.2d 824, 825 , 474 N.Y.S.2d 763, 765 (1st Dep’t 1984) (citing Republic of Argentina v. City of New York, 25 N.Y.2d 252, 265 , 303 N.Y.S.2d 644, 652-53 , 250 N.E.2d 698, 706-07 (1969)) (applying § 394 a-1.0 of the New York Administrative Code, the predecessor section to § 7-201).
discussed Cited "see" American Tel. & Tel. v. NYC DEPT. OF HUMAN RES. (2×)
S.D.N.Y. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Murray v. LeRoy Central School District, 67 N.Y.2d 775 , 500 N.Y.S.2d 643 , 491 N.E.2d 1100 (1986) (applying § 3813 of the Education Law); Chinatown Apartments, Inc. v. New York City Transit Authority, 100 A.D.2d 824, 825 , 474 N.Y.S.2d 763, 765 (1st Dep't 1984) ( citing Republic of Argentina v. City of New York, 25 N.Y.2d 252, 265 , 303 N.Y.S.2d 644, 652-53 , 250 N.E.2d 698, 706-07 (1969)) (applying § 394 a-1.0 of the New York Administrative Code, the predecessor section to § 7-201).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Irma C. Pollack LLC v. OP Dev. Corp.
N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. · 2025 · signal: see also · confidence low
NO. 175 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/08/2025 old one and the remedy for any breach thereof is to sue on the superseding agreement”], affd 64 NY2d 930 [1985]; See also Citigifts, Inc. v Pechnik, 112 AD2d 832 [1st Dept 1985], affd, 67 NY2d 774 [1986].) “Once an agreement has been rescinded, there can be no claims based on the cancelled agreement unless the right to make such claims is expressly or impliedly reserved within the terms of the rescission.” (Milan Music, Inc. v Emmel Communications Booking, Inc., 37 AD3d 206 [1st Dept 2007].) Any breaches from 2008 to 2017 would be under the Standstill …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Citigifts, Inc.
v.
Samuel J. Pechnik
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 18, 1986.
491 N.E.2d 1100
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Sherwin Grossfield for appellants., Herbert Rubin, David B. Hamm and Barbara D. Goldberg for respondents.
Cited by 13 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division properly concluded that there was a novation which extinguished the old agreement and relegated plaintiffs to an action for breach of the new agreement (Northville Indus. Corp. v Fort Neck Oil Terms. Corp., 100 AD2d 865, 867, affd 64 NY2d 930).

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.