green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Cayenne v. Goord
(2×)
The Court of Appeals has stated that “a claimed error to which no objection was made on administrative appeal” does not constitute “a question of law” (Matter of Crowley v O’Keefe, 74 NY2d 780, 780-781 [1989]).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shell v. Goord
In any event, inasmuch as petitioner failed to make a timely objection regarding the authenticity of the refusals during the prison disciplinary hearing when the alleged deficiency could have been corrected, the claim that the Hearing Officer should have conducted a further inquiry was waived (see, Matter of Loper v Goord, 290 AD2d 682 ; Matter of Hidalgo v Senkowski, 283 AD2d 839 ; see also, Matter of Crowley v O’Keefe, 148 AD2d 816, 817 , appeal dismissed 74 NY2d 780 , lv denied 74 NY2d 613 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of David Crowley, Appellant,
v.
John O’Keefe, as Superintendent of Ogdensburg Correctional Facility, Et Al., Respondents
v.
John O’Keefe, as Superintendent of Ogdensburg Correctional Facility, Et Al., Respondents
New York Court of Appeals.
Jul 11, 1989.
543 N.E.2d 744
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Motion to dismiss appeal granted and appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no appeal lies as of right under CPLR 5601 (a) since the dissent at the Appellate Division, pertaining to a claimed error to which no objection was made on administrative appeal, is not on a question of[*781] law which would be reviewable in this court (Merrill v Albany Med. Center Hosp., 71 NY2d 990).