green
Positive treatment
2.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998
2012
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Bergin v. Grace
Harris & Sons v Burke, Cavalier, Lindy & Engel, 202 AD2d 929, 930 [1994]; see Deitz v Kelleher & Flink, supra at 945; see also Logalbo v Plishkin, Rubano & Baum, 163 AD2d 511, 514 [1990], lv dismissed 77 NY2d 940 [1991]; Shaughnessy v Baron, 151 AD2d 561, 562 [1989]; see generally Jones Lang Wootton USA v LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, 243 AD2d 168, 175 [1998], Iv dismissed 92 NY2d 962 [1998]).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
82 Retail LLC v. Eighty Two Condominium
Corp., 6 AD3d 298, 299 [1st Dept 2004]; see also Jones Lang Wootton USA v LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, 243 AD2d 168, 182-183 [1st Dept 1998], lv dismissed 92 NY2d 962 [1998]).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
82 Retail LLC v. Eighty Two Condominium
Corp., 6 AD3d 298, 299 [1st Dept 2004]; see also Jones Lang Wootton USA v LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, 243 AD2d 168, 182-183 [1st Dept 1998], lv dismissed 92 NY2d 962 [1998]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jones Lang Wootton USA et al., Appellants,
v.
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & McRae, et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)
v.
LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & McRae, et al., Respondents. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Published
Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the April 16, 1998 Appellate Division order, dismissed as untimely upon the ground that the prior motion for leave to appeal made to the Appellate Division was untimely (see, Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 73, at 452 [3d ed]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the July 30, 1998 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that the order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.