State ex rel. Thomas v. DeWine, 938 N.E.2d 328 (Ohio 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
State ex rel. Thomas v. DeWine, 938 N.E.2d 328 (Ohio 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The State Ex Rel. Thomas, Appellant,
v.
DeWine, Judge, Appellee
2010-1241.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Oct 19, 2010.
938 N.E.2d 328
Ako Thomas, pro se.
Brown, Pfeifer, Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell, Cupp, Lanzinger.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment dismissing the petition of appellant, Ako Thomas, for a writ of mandamus to compel appellee, Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas Judge Patrick DeWine, to resentence him in order to provide him oral notification at his sentencing hearing of his mandatory five-year postreleasecontrol term. Thomas “had an adequate remedy by way of direct appeal from his sentence to raise his claim that he did not receive proper notification about postrelease control at his sentencing hearing.” Briseno v. Cook, 121 Ohio St.3d 38, 2009-Ohio-308, 901 N.E.2d 798, ¶ 1.

Judgment affirmed.

Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., concurs in judgment only.