State ex rel. Fant v. Tober, 623 N.E.2d 1201 (Ohio 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
State ex rel. Fant v. Tober, 623 N.E.2d 1201 (Ohio 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“t is the responsibility of the person who wishes to inspect and/or copy records to identify with reasonable clarity the records at issue”
51 citation events (45 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ. (ohioctcl, 2024-06-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1994 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1994 2010 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Schaffer v. Ohio State Univ.
Ohio Ct. Cl. · 2024 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
t is the responsibility of the person who wishes to inspect and/or copy records to identify with reasonable clarity the records at issue
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The State ex rel. Fant
v.
Tober
No. 93-831.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Dec 29, 1993.
623 N.E.2d 1201
Henry J. Fant, pro se. , Juan Edgardo Adorno, for appellee.
Douglas, Moyer, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 68%
Citer courts: Ohio Court of Claims (1)

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., AW. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney, J., not participating.