green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012
2019
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Oregon Shores Conservation v. Bd. of County
The county’s job as the trier of fact was to decide by a preponderance of the evidence what the estimated cost of constructing the planned homes was.” 351 Or at 246-47 (citation omitted). 4 See Friends II, 351 Or at 246 (reasoning that the county misconstrued the applicable law by failing to “determine the type of homes that [the landowner] planned to build” and “what the estimated cost of building those homes was”); id. at 246 n 20 (“In deciding the cost of building the homes, the county must find what type of homes [the landowner] planned to build.
discussed
Cited "see"
State ex rel. Dewberry v. Kitzhaber
Finally, a violation of the separation of powers provision “may be found only if the problem is clear.” Id.; accord Smejkal v. DAS, 239 Or App 553 , 562, 246 P3d 1140 (2010), rev den, 351 Or 541 (2012).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Inman
See, e.g., State v. Pickett, 246 Or App 62, 65 , 264 P3d 209 (2011), rev den, 351 Or 541 (2012) (vouching by medical witness not prejudicial where the defendant admitted to sexually abusing the victim and there was substantiating photographic evidence of the abuse); State v. Childs, 243 Or App 129, 131-32 , 259 P3d 77 , rev den, 350 Or 573 (2011) (medical witness vouching not likely to have affected the court’s verdict where there was photographic evidence corroborating the victim’s account of the abuse and the court explicitly eschewed any reliance on the expert testimony).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. City of Gresham
See, e.g., Rood v. Coos County, 240 Or App 68 , 72 n 3, 246 P3d 69 (2010), rev den, 351 Or 541 (2012).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
TORRES.
v.
TORRES.
S059861.
Oregon Supreme Court.
Jan 12, 2012.
Published
Petition for Review Denied.