Steinkirchner v. Linscheid, 195 P.2d 592 (Kan. 1948). · Go Syfert
Search
Steinkirchner v. Linscheid, 195 P.2d 592 (Kan. 1948). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“capital crime, felony or offense' . . . 7 do not include an offense in which death in no event can be inflicted.”
9 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Ameer (nm, 2018-04-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) State v. Ameer
N.M. · 2018 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
capital crime, felony or offense' . . . do not include an offense in which death in no event can be inflicted.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) State v. Ameer
N.M. · 2018 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
capital crime, felony or offense' . . . 7 do not include an offense in which death in no event can be inflicted.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Elizabeth Steinkirchner
v.
W. P. Linscheid
No. 36,884.
Supreme Court of Kansas.
Jul 10, 1948.
195 P.2d 592
Emmet A. Blaes, of Wichita, argued the cause, and W. D. Jochems, J. Wirth Sargent, Roetzel Jochems and Robert G. Braden, all of Wichita, were with him on the briefs for the appellant., J. G. Somers, of Newton, argued the cause, and Arthur N. Turner, of Newton, was with him on the briefs for the appellee.
Cowan.
Published

[*391] OPINION ON REHEARING

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Cowan, J.:

A rehearing was granted in the cause. The case has been reargued but the court finds nothing in the reargument to change its previous views as expressed in the former opinion of the court filed January 24, 1948. The opinion and judgment of affirmance are adhered to.

Wedell and Hoch, JJ., adhere to the views previously indicated by their concurrence in the dissenting opinion of the late Mr. Justice Burch. Furthermore, they think that the court should have considered and determined the question as again urged by both parties in their joint motion for the rehearing, whether William H. Steinkirchner possesses a homestead right in the Harvey county property involved, a question properly presented under the declaratory judgment statute, G. S. 1935, 60-3127.