green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1983 ·
…e can add nothing constructive to the well considered opinion of that court and, accordingly, approve and adopt the reasoning thereof
✓
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975
2000
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Smith v. Shannon
(2×)
e can add nothing constructive to the well considered opinion of that court and, accordingly, approve and adopt the reasoning thereof
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
E.C. v. Virginia Dep't of Juvenile Justice
See also Bennett v. State, 289 A.2d 28, 30 (Me. 1972) (applying statute governing habeas corpus remedy then in effect and noting Maine's statute provided for broader relief than release). 5 See, e.g., People v. Villa, 202 P.3d 427, 432 (Cal. 2009) (while citing federal jurisprudence that collateral consequences may be relevant in determining mootness, court held collateral consequences do not constitute custody for purposes of habeas attack); Duran v. Morris, 635 P.2d 43, 45 (Utah 1981)(while citing federal jurisprudence that collateral consequences may be relevant in determining mootness, cou…
discussed
Cited "see"
Festa v. Greenberg
(2×)
Accord, Miller v. Kennedy, 11 Wash.App. 272 , 522 P.2d 852 (1974), aff'd per curiam, 85 Wash.2d 151 , 530 P.2d 334 (1975). 3 Quoting Miller , the Smith Court stated that “once it has been established by expert medical testi *359 mony that a risk existed, then the existence of the risk is the patient’s business; and it is not for the medical profession to establish a criteria [sic] for the dissemination of information to the patient based upon what doctors feel the patient should be told.” Smith, 100 Wash.2d at 30 , 666 P.2d at 354 (citation omitted) (emphasis added).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Dahl
(2×)
See Miller v. Kennedy, 85 Wn.2d 151, 152 , 530 P.2d 334 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nixdorf v. Hicken
(2×)
See Miller v. Kennedy, 11 Wash.App. 272 , 522 P.2d 852 (1974), approved and adapted, 85 Wash.2d 151 , 530 P.2d 334 (1975); This case must be distinguished from the situations in which the needle is broken during the suturing.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re the Personal Restraint of Sinka
(2×)
See Monohan v. Burdman, 84 Wn.2d 922, 930 , 530 P.2d 334 (1975).
examined
Cited "see"
Memel v. Reimer
(4×)
See Miller v. Kennedy, 85 Wn.2d 151 , 530 P.2d 334 (1974).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. Schaefer
(4×)
See also Miller v. Kennedy, 11 Wash. App. 272 , 522 P.2d 852, 860 (1974), aff'd per curiam, 85 Wash.2d 151 , 530 P.2d 334 (1975); Woods v. Brumlop, 71 N.M. 221 , 377 P.2d 520, 524 (1962).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hook Ex Rel. Estate of Summers v. Rothstein
See, e.g., Miller v. Kennedy, 11 Wash. App. 272 , 522 P. (2d) 852, 863 (1974), aff’d per curiam, 85 Wash. (2d) 151, 530 P. (2d) 334 (1975); Wilkinson v. Vesey, 110 R.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richard R. Miller, Respondent,
v.
John A. Kennedy, Petitioner
v.
John A. Kennedy, Petitioner
43388.
Washington Supreme Court.
Jan 16, 1975.
Wayne J. Davies, for petitioner., Edward M. Lane, for respondent.
Per Curiam.
Cited by 85 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Washington Supreme Court (2)
Per Curiam.
We granted a petition for review of the Court of Appeals disposition of issues revolving about the doctrines of res ipsa loquitur and informed consent in a medical malpractice case. Miller v. Kennedy, 11 Wn. App. 272, 522 P.2d 852 (1974), petition for review granted, 84 Wn.2d 1008 (1974).
[*152] Our review of the record convinces us that the Court of Appeals did not err in its discussion or disposition of the issues involved. We can add nothing constructive to the well considered opinion of that court and, accordingly, approve and adopt the reasoning thereof.
The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.