State v. Gamboa, 154 P.3d 722 (Or. 2007). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Gamboa, 154 P.3d 722 (Or. 2007). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“that additional documents needed to be finalized was not a bar to the existence of a binding contract but, rather, a term of the contract in the sense that the parties had agreed to create the documents.”
89 citation events (89 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Wieck v. Hostetter (orctapp, 2015-10-21)
Treatment trajectory · 2007 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2007 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Wieck v. Hostetter
Or. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
that additional documents needed to be finalized was not a bar to the existence of a binding contract but, rather, a term of the contract in the sense that the parties had agreed to create the documents.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Eller v. ABM Industries Inc.
Or. Ct. App. · 2026 · confidence medium
Even if a rational factfinder could conclude that plaintiff “is playing fast and loose with the courts,” id. at 554, plaintiff produced evidence in opposing defendant’s summary judgment motion that supports a reasonable inference that he was not, such that there are genuine issues of material fact and defendant is not entitled to judgment as a matter of law on its affirmative defense of judicial estoppel.
discussed Cited "see" Sandhu v. Kumar
Or. Ct. App. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Glover v. Bank of New York, 208 Or App 545 , 147 P3d 336 (2006), rev den, 342 Or 416 (2007) (discussing judicial estoppel in context of a fail- ure to disclose assets in a bankruptcy proceeding).
discussed Cited "see" Dept. of Forestry v. PacifiCorp (2×)
Or. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dew v. City of Scappoose, 208 Or.App. 121, 144 , 145 P.3d 198 (2006), rev. den., 342 Or. 416 , 154 P.3d 722 (2007).
cited Cited "see" State Ex Rel. Department of Forestry v. PacifiCorp
Or. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dew v. City of Scappoose, 208 Or App 121, 144 , 145 P3d 198 (2006), rev den, 342 Or 416 (2007).
discussed Cited "see" Rosekrans v. CLASS HARBOR ASS'N, INC.
Or. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Dalton v. Robert John Corp., 209 Or App 120, 139 , 146 P3d 399 (2006), rev den, 342 Or 416 (2007) (a term is material to the license agreement “when it goes to the substance of the contract and, if breached, defeats the object of the parties in entering into the agreement”).
discussed Cited "see" Hall v. Douglas County
Or. Ct. App. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Glover v. Bank of New York, 208 Or App 545, 561 , 147 P3d 336 (2006), rev den, 342 Or 416 (2007) (without transcript of the hearing at which trial court exercised discretion, a court is unable to review whether trial court abused its discretion); Farmers Ins. v. Hansen, 46 Or App 377, 380 , 611 P2d 696 (1980) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
GAMBOA.
S54303.
Oregon Supreme Court.
Feb 21, 2007.
154 P.3d 722
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 63%
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of Oregon (1)

Petition for review denied.