green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 6×
22.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…an error in a trial is not grounds for reversal unless the error was prejudicial to the defendant.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2011 ·
…structural errors include things like relieving the state of its burden of proof, denying a public trial, and denying counsel.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases ·
…utside of reversal for insufficiency of the evidence ... , outright dismissal is rarely granted.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Martinez
an error in a trial is not grounds for reversal unless the error was prejudicial to the defendant.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Martinez
an error in a trial is not grounds for reversal unless the error was prejudicial to the defendant.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
City of Seattle v. Erickson
utside of reversal for insufficiency of the evidence ... , outright dismissal is rarely granted.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
City of Seattle v. Erickson
utside of reversal for insufficiency of the evidence ... , outright dismissal is rarely granted.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Applegate
structural errors include things like relieving the state of its burden of proof, denying a public trial, and denying counsel.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Applegate
structural errors include things like relieving the state of its burden of proof, denying a public trial, and denying counsel.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lui
See State v. Grenning, 169 Wn.2d 47, 59-60 , 234 P.3d 169 (2010); State v. Maupin, 128 Wn.2d 918, 928-30 , 913 P.2d 808 (1996); State v. Easter, 130 Wn.2d 228, 242-43 , 922 P.2d 1285 (1996); State v. St.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lui
See State v. Grenning, 169 Wn.2d 47, 59-60 , 234 P.3d 169 (2010); State v. Maupin, 128 Wn.2d 918, 928-30 , 913 P.2d 808 (1996); State v. Easter, 130 Wn.2d 228, 242-43 , 922 P.2d 1285 (1996); State v. St.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State Of Washington, V. Mehmet Bilgi
In Boyd, our supreme court held that where a defendant is charged with offenses involving child pornography based on images on his computer, “adequate representation requires providing a ‘mirror image’ of that hard drive; enabling the defense attorney to consult with computer experts who can tell how the evidence made its way onto the computer.” 160 Wn.2d at 436 ; see also State v. Grenning, 169 Wn.2d 47, 56 , 234 P.3d 169 (2010).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Personal Restraint Petition of Casey Dullea Peppin
The court also noted, “[w]here the nature of the case is such that copies are necessary in order that defense counsel can fulfill this critical role, CrR 4.7(a) obliges the prosecutor to provide copies of the evidence as a necessary consequence of the right to effective representation and a fair trial.” Id. at 435; see also State v. Grenning, 169 Wn.2d 47 , 234 P.3d 169 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Clifford James GROGAN, Petitioner.
v.
Clifford James GROGAN, Petitioner.
82609-9.
Washington Supreme Court.
Jun 2, 2010.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Washington Supreme Court (4) · Court of Appeals of Washington (2)
ORDER
¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens, considered at its June 1, 2010, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Three for reconsideration in light of Supreme Court No. 81243-8 State of Washington v. Keith Ian Dow, 168 Wash.2d 243, 227 P.3d 1278 (2010).
For the Court
/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE