In re Long (, 357 P.3d 877 (Kan. 2015). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Long (, 357 P.3d 877 (Kan. 2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“a defendant who files a motion for new counsel must show justifiable dissatisfaction with his or her appointed counsel.”
61 citation events (61 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Guebara (kan, 2024-03-08)
Treatment trajectory · 2015 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2015 2020 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Guebara
Kan. · 2024 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
a defendant who files a motion for new counsel must show justifiable dissatisfaction with his or her appointed counsel.
cited Cited "see" State v. Valdez
Kan. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Pfannenstiel, 302 Kan. 747, 760 , 357 P.3d 877 (2015).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jarmon
Kan. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Pfannenstiel , 302 Kan. 747 , 760-61, 357 P.3d 877 (2015) (duty to conduct inquiry on substitution of counsel can lead to three types of errors, each of which is reviewed on appeal for an abuse of discretion); State v. Richardson , 290 Kan. 176 , 185, 224 P.3d 553 (2010) (discretion not abused in refusing to appoint new counsel for defendant).
cited Cited "see" State v. Corey
Kan. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Pfannenstiel, 302 Kan. 747, 753 , 357 P.3d 877 (2015).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Baugh
Kan. Ct. App. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
Vann, 280 Kan. at 789 ; see also State v. Pfannenstiel, 302 Kan. 747, 761 , 357 P.3d 877 (2015) (noting abuse of discretion can also occur when court investigates but fails to conduct an appropriate inquiry, or when court conducts appropriate inquiry but fails to appoint substitute counsel). 6 Here, the district court did little to ensure Baugh's right to counsel was honored.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Gary W. Long, II, Petitioner
Bar Docket 13564.
Supreme Court of Kansas.
Sep 24, 2015.
357 P.3d 877
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 58%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Kansas (1)

On January 27, 1998, petitioner, Gaiy W. Long, II, surrendered his license to practice law in Kansas. Under Supreme Court Rule 217 (2014 Kan. Ct. R. Annot. 403), on March 6, 1998, this court disbarred petitioner from tire practice of law in Kansas. See In re Long, 264 Kan. 2, 957 P.2d 1105 (1998).

Following a hearing, a hearing panel of the Kansas Roard for Discipline of Attorneys recommended to the court that petitioner s license to practice law be reinstated, conditioned on petitioner first taking and passing the Kansas bar examination. After careful consideration, tire court accepted the recommendation of the hearing panel. Petitioner took and passed the July 2015 Kansas bar examination.

It Is Therefore Ordered that petitioner be reinstated to die practice of law in Kansas conditioned upon his compliance with the annual continuing legal education requirements and upon his payment of all fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission. Upon proof provided to the Clerk of the Appellate Courts that petitioner has complied with the annual continuing legal education requirements and has paid the fees required by the Clerk of the Appellate Courts and the Kansas Continuing Legal Education Commission, the Clerk is directed to enter petitioner s name upon the roster of attorneys engaged in the practice of law in Kansas.

It Is Further Ordered that this order be published in the official Kansas Reports.