green
Positive treatment
15.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 14 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Haute Plank Incorporated v. Grato S.L. LLC
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 75 P.3d 1075, 1078 (Ariz. 15 Ct. App. 2003)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Travieso v. Glock Incorporated
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 25 75 P.3d 1075, 1078 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003)). 26 Furthermore, settlement agreements are enforced and governed by general contract 27 principles.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: Erling S. Calkins and Elaine S. Calkins
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 75 P.3d 1075, 1078 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
McCarthy v. Scottsdale Unified School District No. 48
Reynolds 21 Tobacco Co., 75 P.3d 1075, 1078 (Ariz. Ct. App. 2003) (citations and quotation marks 22 omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Dobyns v. United States
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 206 Ariz. 117 , 75 P.3d 1075, 1079-80 (Ariz.App.2003); Triangle Constr., Div. of Bentley-Dille Gradall Rentals, Inc. v. City of Phoenix, 149 Ariz. 486 , 720 P.2d 87, 91 (Ariz.App.1985) (the "only reasonable construction” of a contract is that a term "has the same meaning throughout the paragraph”).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
KnightBrook Insurance v. Payless Car Rental System, Inc.
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 206 Ariz. 117 , 75 P.3d 1075, 1078 (Ariz.Ct.App.2003) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In re the Marriage of Johnson
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 206 Ariz. 117, ¶¶ 21-24 , 75 P.3d 1075, 1079-80 (App.2003) (same meaning rule does not override other canons of construction).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Bennett v. Baxter Group, Inc.
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 206 Ariz. 117, ¶ 12 , 75 P.3d 1075, 1078 (App.2003) (we construe contract in its entirety).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
AGA SHAREHOLDERS, LLC v. CSK Auto, Inc.
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 206 Ariz. 117 , 75 P.3d 1075, 1078 (Ariz.Ct.App.2003) (citations and quotation marks omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Malad, Inc. v. Miller
(2×)
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 206 Ariz. 117, 120, ¶ 12 , 75 P.3d 1075, 1078 (App.2003). ¶ 18 Here, the amendment to the sales agreement stated in part: “The close of escrow shall be extended to May 15, 2002 or *372 upon delivery of clear title and verification of water rights by the sellers whichever occurs later.” We consider the first portion of the amendment as clearly stating “[t]he close of escrow shall be extended to May 15, 2002.” By specifying the date of May 15, 2002, the parties clearly intended to extend the close of escrow to at least that date. ¶ 19 Beyond May 15, 2002, we must…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Jones v. Cochise County
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 206 Ariz. 117, ¶ 13 , 75 P.3d 1075, 1078 (App.2003) *376 (in interpreting contract, “we read words ‘in the context in which they are used, and [considering] the purposes sought ... by the agreement.’ ”), quoting Employment Sec.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United Dairymen of Arizona v. Schugg
(2×)
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 206 Ariz. 117, 120, ¶ 12 , 75 P.3d 1075, 1078 (App.2003). ¶30 Paragraph 3 of the Agreement requires UDA to “use its best efforts to market the Member’s milk in such manner as the Association shall deem to be to the best advantage of the Member and all other Members of the Association____” (Emphasis added.) UDA’s contractual duty to “market” milk reasonably includes taking actions to protect its long-term ability to sell at prices beneficial to its members.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Estate of Lamparella
(2×)
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 206 Ariz. 117, 120, ¶ 12 , 75 P.3d 1075, 1078 (App.2003).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Johnson v. Earnhardt's Gilbert Dodge, Inc.
(2×)
Reynolds Tobacco Co., 206 Ariz. 117 , 120 ¶¶ 12-13, 75 P.3d 1075, 1078 (App.2003) (words of contract are given their plain meaning).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jason Mendy FELD
v.
Hon. Stephen a GERST/State
v.
Hon. Stephen a GERST/State
CV-03-0186-PR.
Arizona Supreme Court.
Sep 9, 2003.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
ORDERED: Petition for Review of a Special Action Decision of the Court of Appeals = DENIED.
FURTHER ORDERED: The Court of Appeals’ Opinion shall not be published, pursuant to Rule 111(g), Arizona Rules of the Supreme Court.