discussed Cited "see" State v. Gomez-Lobato. (2×) See State v. Barros, 105 Hawai#i 160, 169, 95 P.3d 14, 24 (App. 2004) (“[The defendant] has failed to direct us to any ‘salient fact’ bearing upon his ability to understand his jury waiver. . . such as the defendant’s lack of English in Duarte-Higareda . . . that would have created the need for an extensive colloquy by the trial court[.]”) (emphasis omitted) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted), cert. denied, 105 Hawai#i 196, 95 P.3d 627 (2004); State v. Mitchell, 94 Hawai#i 388, 395, 15 P.3d 314 , 321 14 Obviously if it is evident on-the-record that a non-native speaker …