green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
16.9 score
G Cite
cited 8× by 3 distinct cases, 2002–2015 · 2 courts ·
…n general, the construction placed upon a statute by the courts becomes a part of the act, from the very beginning
at p. 208
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1947 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1947
1986
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Com. v. Staley, B.
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (quoted)
n general, the construction placed upon a statute by the courts becomes a part of the act, from the very beginning
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Kendrick v. DA OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (quoted)
n general, the construction placed upon a statute by the courts becomes a part of the act, from the very beginning
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Commonwealth v. Eller
(4×)
also: Cited as authority (quoted)
n general, the construction placed upon a statute by the courts becomes a part of the act, from the very beginning
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Marriage of JMH and Rouse
Co., 356 Pa. 349 , 52 A.2d 205, 208 (1947).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bunkley v. State
Co. , [ 356 Pa. 349 ,] 52 A.2d 205, 208 (1947) (stating that "[i]n general, the construction placed upon a statute by the courts becomes a part of the act, from the very beginning "), with Commonwealth v. Fiore, 665 A.2d at 1193; Commonwealth v. Fiore , CC No. 8508740 (Aug. 18, 1994), at 6 (refusing to apply the Scarpone interpretation because "at the time of [Fiore's] conviction and direct appeals, the interpretation of the law was otherwise").
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In re Appointment of Rodriguez
Buradus v. General Cement Products Co., 356 Pa. 349, 349 , 52 A.2d 205, 208 (1947).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Fiore v. White
Co., 52 A. 2d 205, 208 (Pa. 1947) (stating that “[i]n general, the construction placed upon a statute by the courts becomes a part of the act,/rom the very beginning”), with Commonwealth v. Fiore, supra, at 416-417, 665 A. 2d, at 1193 ; Commonwealth v. Fiore , CC No. 8508740 (Aug. 18, 1994), at 6 (refusing to apply the Scarpone interpretation because “at the time of [Fiore’s] conviction and direct appeals, the interpretation of the law was otherwise”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Africa v. Vaughan
(2×)
See Buradus v. General Cement Products Co., 356 Pa. 349 , 52 A.2d 205, 208 (1947).
discussed
Cited "see"
Todora v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
(2×)
See Buradus v. General Cement Products Co., 159 Pa. Superior Ct. 501 , 48 A.2d 883 (1946) [especially the discussion therein at footnote 1], decision affirmed at 356 Pa. 349 , 52 A.2d 205 (1947); Szilagyi v. City of Bethlehem, 312 Pa. 260 , 167 A. 782 (1933).
examined
Cited "see"
August v. Stasak
(4×)
See Buradus v. General Cement Products Co., 356 Pa. 349 , 52 A.2d 205 (1947); Harry C.
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Krasner
(4×)
Co., 283 Pa.Super. 336 , 423 A.2d 1284 (1980); See also Buradus v. General Cement Products, 356 Pa. 349 , 52 A.2d 205 (1947); Harry C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Buradus
v.
General Cement Products Co.
v.
General Cement Products Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 24, 1947.
Arthur M. Grossman , for appellants.
Samuel J. Goldstein , for appellee.
PER CURIAM, April 14, 1947:.
Cited by 55 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania (3) · Superior Court of Pennsylvania (1)
Argued March 24, 1947. The judgment of the Superior Court is affirmed upon the opinion of Judge HIRT. *Page 350