green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
18.6 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1998 ·
…the general rule is that in a criminal case, voluntary fugitive status dis-entitles a defendant to call upon the resources of the court for the disposition of a defendant's legal claims.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1998 ·
…the general rule is that in a criminal case, voluntary fugitive status disentitles a defendant to call upon the resources of the court for the disposition of a defendant's legal claims.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 31 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Commonwealth v. Ford
(4×)
the general rule is that in a criminal case, voluntary fugitive status dis-entitles a defendant to call upon the resources of the court for the disposition of a defendant's legal claims.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Fuller v. Cabinetworks Michigan, LLC
It does purport to apply general principles of Pennsylvania contract law, and subsequent courts have continued to rely on Quiles and Kirleis after Concepcion and Imburgia, similarly tying their reasoning to a lack of mutual assent, so one might argue that Quiles does not create special rules disfavoring arbitration.103 Yet it might never actually communicated to an employee by ensuring that the handbooks are distributed to its employees.”); Morosetti v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co., 564 A.2d 151, 152 (Pa. 1989) (holding that an employer’s severance policy was not binding because the …
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
W. W. v. ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK
Land & Exploration Co., 564 A.2d 151, 153 (Pa. 1989); Bush v. Comcast Cable Communs.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
NELATURY v. THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Co., 564 A.2d 151, 152 (Pa. 1989).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
MCCOY v. PAN AMERICAN GROUP
Land & Exploration Co., 564 A.2d 151, 153 (Pa. 1989); Bush, 2020 U.S. Dist.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
MCCOY v. PAN AMERICAN GROUP
Land & Exploration Co., 564 A.2d 151, 153 (Pa. 1989).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Knapp v. Susquehanna Village Facility Operations, LLC
“A handbook distributed to employees as inducement for employment may be an offer and its acceptance a contract.” Morosetti v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., 564 A.2d 151, 152 (Pa. 1989).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Lee v. Borough of Downingtown
Our Supreme Court stated in Morosetti v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., 522 Pa. 492, 495 , 564 A.2d 151, 152 (1989) that it is not sufficient to show the employer had a policy.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
A.S. v. Office for Dispute Resolution (Quakertown Community School District)
Morosetti v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, 522 Pa. 492, 494-95 , 564 A.2d 151, 152 (1989) (footnotes omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Braun v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
“A handbook distributed to employees as inducement for employment may be an offer and its acceptance a contract.” Morosetti v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., 522 Pa. 492, 495 , 564 A.2d 151, 152 (1989).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Atchison v. Sears
Land and Exploration Co., 522 Pa. 492 , 564 A.2d 151, 152 (1989).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
McCabe v. Women's Resources of Monroe County Inc.
Morosetti v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, 522 Pa. 492, 495 , 564 A.2d 151, 152 (1989).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Quiles v. Financial Exchange Co.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
The court stated “An offer must be intentional, definite, in its terms and communicated, otherwise the minds cannot meet.” Id. at 152 (emphasis added). ¶ 12 Although Dollar published its arbitration process in its employee handbooks, unlike the facts in Morosetti , it has no binding effect on employment-related actions if that policy is never actually communicated to an employee by ensuring that the handbooks are distributed to its employees.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Nicholas v. Pennsylvania State University
Morosetti v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., 522 Pa. 492 , 564 A.2d 151, 153 (1989).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
W. Channing Nicholas, M.D. v. Pennsylvania State University
A company may indeed have a policy upon which they intend to act, given certain circumstances or events, but unless they communicate that policy as part of a definite offer of employment they are free to change as events may require. 72 Morosetti v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co., 564 A.2d 151, 153 (Pa. 1989).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bauer v. Pottsville Area Emergency Medical Services, Inc.
(2×)
Richardson v. Charles Cole Memorial Hospital, 320 Pa.Super. 106 , 466 A.2d 1084 (1983) (cited with approval in Morosetti v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co., 522 Pa. 492, 495-97 , 564 A.2d 151, 153 (1989)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Jordan v. SmithKline Beecham, Inc.
Morosetti v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co., 522 Pa. 492 , 564 A.2d 151, 152 (1989).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Luteran v. Loral Fairchild Corp.
Morosetti v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, 522 Pa. 492 , 564 A.2d 151, 152 (1989) (citation omitted).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Highhouse v. Avery Transportation
Land and Exploration Co., 522 Pa. 492, 494 , 564 A.2d 151, 152 (1989) (footnotes omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
DiPlacido v. GTE North Inc.
A company may indeed have a policy upon which they intend to act, given certain circumstances or events, but unless they communicate that policy as part of a definite offer of employment they are free to change [it] as events may require.” Morosetti v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co., 522 Pa. 492, 496 , 564 A.2d 151, 153 (1989). (citation omitted) “[I]t is for the court to interpret the handbook [or policy] to discern whether it contains evidence of the employer’s intention to be legally bound [by it]. ” Ruzicki v. Catholic Cemeteries Association of Diocese of Pittsburgh, 416 Pa. Su…
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Stumpp v. Stroudsburg Municipal Authority
Morosetti v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co., 522 Pa. 492, 494 , 564 A.2d 151, 152 (1989).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Holewinski v. CHILDREN'S HOSP. OF PITTS.
Morosetti v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co., 522 Pa. 492, 494-95 , 564 A.2d 151, 152 (1989).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Anderson v. Haverford College
“A company may indeed have a policy upon which they intend to act, given certain circumstances or events, but unless they communicate that policy as part of a definite offer of employment they are free to change as events may require.” Rutherfoord v. Presbyterian-University, 417 Pa.Super. 316 , 612 A.2d 500, 504 (1992) (quoting Morosetti v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co., 522 Pa. 492, 496 , 564 A.2d 151, 152-53 (1989)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Raines v. Haverford College
“A company may indeed have a policy upon which they intend to act, given certain circumstances or events, but unless they communicate that policy as part of a definite offer of employment they are free to change as events may require.” Rutherfoord v. Presbyterian-University, 417 Pa.Super. 316 , 612 A.2d 500, 504 (1992) (quoting Morosetti v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co., 522 Pa. 492, 496 , 564 A.2d 151, 152-53 (1989)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Rutherfoord v. Presbyterian-University Hospital
Morosetti v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co., 522 Pa. 492, 495, 496 , 564 A.2d 151, 152, 153 (1989) (footnotes and citation omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Gruver v. Ezon Products, Inc.
(2×)
Id. 564 A.2d at 153 (Zappala, J., concurring).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Jacobini v. v. & O. PRESS CO.
Morosetti v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co., 522 Pa. 492, 496 , 564 A.2d 151, 153 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Com. v. Lubenski, N.
See Commonwealth v. Craddock, 535 A.2d 1189, 1191-92 (Pa. Super 1988), aff’d, 564 A.2d 151 (Pa. 1989). -4- J-S11014-21 Although a defendant has the right to be present at trial, the right is not absolute, and can be waived if the defendant either expressly or implicitly does so.
cited
Cited "see"
Henderson v. Merck & Co., Inc.
See Morosetti v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co., 522 Pa. 492 , 564 A.2d 151 (1989) (citations omitted).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hayes v. Community General Osteopathic Hospital
See, e.g., Morosetti v. Louisiana Land And Exploration Co., 522 Pa. 492 , 564 A.2d 151 (1989) (dictum); Martin v. Capital Cities Media, Inc., 354 Pa.Super. 199 , 511 A.2d 830 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania
v.
Andre CRADDOCK, Appellant.
v.
Andre CRADDOCK, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Sep 5, 1989.
Nix, C.J., and Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala and Papadakos.
Published
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (4)
Steven A. Morley, Philadelphia, for appellant.
Gaele McLaughlin Barthold, Deputy Dist. Atty., Ronald Eisenberg, Chief, Appeals Div., George S. Leone, Philadelphia, for appellee.
[*492] Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Order affirmed.