green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1997 ·
…ne of the central reasons for conducting business in. corporate form is the avoidance of personal liability by those holding equity in the corporation and the limitation of the risk of those persons to the value of their equity.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
First Union National Bank v. Quality Carriers Inc.
(2×)
But see, Village at Camelback Property Owners Association Inc. v. Carr, 371 Pa. Super. 452, 461 , 538 A.2d 528 (1988), aff’d, 524 Pa. 330 , 572 A.2d 1 (1990) (piercing corporate veil due to undercapitalization, intermingling of corporate and personal affairs of shareholder and failure to adhere to corporate formalities).
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Glidden Co. v. Department of Labor & Industry
(2×)
ne of the central reasons for conducting business in. corporate form is the avoidance of personal liability by those holding equity in the corporation and the limitation of the risk of those persons to the value of their equity.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Osprey Cove Rd. v. Kempin
In Lane, the trial judge granted the "motion to confirm settlement" and concluded, "it is important that one lawyer be able to accept another lawyer's representation." Lane, 572 A.2d at 1084.
discussed
Cited "see"
American Guarantee & Liability Insurance v. Fojanini
(2×)
See Wicks v. Milzo-co Builders, Inc., 503 Pa. 614 , 470 A.2d 86 (1983) (applying the participation theory). *624 Third, "[a] corporate officer is of course liable for the breach of any promises or representations which he extends not in his capacity as an officer but personally in his individual capacity.” Loeffler v. McShane, 372 Pa.Super. 442 , 448 n. 3, 539 A.2d 876, 879, n. 3 (1988), aff'd, 524 Pa. 330 , 572 A.2d 1 (1990) (citing Village at Camelback Property Owners Ass’n v. Carr, 371 Pa.Super. 452 , 538 A.2d 528 (1988)).
examined
Cited "see"
Brindley v. Woodland Village Restaurant, Inc.
(4×)
Id. at 621 , 470 A.2d at 89-90 (footnote omitted); accord Village at Camelback v. Carr, 371 Pa.Super. 452, 462 , 538 A.2d 528, 533 (1988), affd, 524 Pa. 330 , 572 A.2d 1 (1990); see also Loeffler v. McShane, 372 Pa.Super. 442, 445-46 , 539 A.2d 876, 878 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Seal v. Riverside Federal Savings Bank
(2×)
See Village at Camelback v. Cair, 371 Pa.Super. 452 , 538 A.2d 528, 533 (1988) (in deciding whether to pierce the corporate veil, courts are concerned with determining "if the corporate form is a sham, constituting a facade for the operations of the dominant shareholder”), aff'd 524 Pa. 330 , 572 A.2d 1 (1900); Sweeney v. Dep't of Transp., 120 Pa.Cmwlth. 591 , 549 A.2d 1001, 1003 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer v. Snap-On Tools Corporation, Kenneth Baldwin and Keith A. Kaiser. Appeal of James F. Boyer and Mary R. Boyer
See Loeffler v. McShane, 372 Pa.Super. 442, 446-47 , 539 A.2d 876, 878 (1988) (quoting Wicks v. Milzoco Builders, Inc., 503 Pa. 614, 621 , 470 A.2d 86, 90 (1983)) (“officer of a corporation who takes part in the commission of a tort by the corporation is personally liable therefor”); see also Village at Camelback Property Owners’ Ass’n v. Carr, 371 Pa. Super. 452, 462-63 , 538 A.2d 528, 533-34 (1988), aff'd, 572 A.2d 1 (1990); Moy v. Schreiber Deed Sec.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The VILLAGE AT CAMELBACK PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee.
v.
Frank P. CARR, III, individually and Frank P. Carr, III, t/a Frank P. Carr, III Realty, Camelback Associates, Inc., t/a The Village at Camelback, Frank Enterprises, Inc., Chateau Associates, Ltd., Side II, Inc., Side II Associates, Ltd., and Side II, Associates, Ltd., t/a Ski Side Village, kAppellants.
v.
Frank P. CARR, III, individually and Frank P. Carr, III, t/a Frank P. Carr, III Realty, Camelback Associates, Inc., t/a The Village at Camelback, Frank Enterprises, Inc., Chateau Associates, Ltd., Side II, Inc., Side II Associates, Ltd., and Side II, Associates, Ltd., t/a Ski Side Village, kAppellants.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 20, 1990.
Nix, C.J., and Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala and Papadakos.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylv… (2)
John Rogers Carroll, Philadelphia, for appellants.
[*331] Mark P. Pazuhanich, Stroudsburg, for appellee.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The Order of the Superior Court is affirmed. See Tafflin et al. v. Levitt et al., ___ U.S. ___, 110 S.Ct. 792, 107 L.Ed.2d 887 (1990).