Commonwealth v. Peterson, 44 A.3d 655 (Pa. 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Commonwealth v. Peterson, 44 A.3d 655 (Pa. 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Com. v. Harth, K. (pasuperct, 2019-10-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Harth, K.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Commonwealth v. Peterson, 19 A.3d 1131, 1137 (Pa.Super. 2011) (en banc), affirmed, 615 Pa. 587 , 44 A.3d 655 (2012) (stating: “A joint continuance is excludable”). “[T]ime attributable to the normal progression of a case simply is not ‘delay’ for purposes of Rule 600.” Commonwealth v. Mills, 640 Pa. 118 , 122, 162 A.3d 323, 325 (2017). “[W]here a trial-ready prosecutor must wait…due to a court calendar, the time should be treated as ‘delay’ for which the Commonwealth is not accountable.” Id. (emphasis added).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Harding, R.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Commonwealth v. Peterson, 19 A.3d 1131, 1137 (Pa.Super. 2011) (en banc), affirmed, 615 Pa. 587 , 44 A.3d 655 (2012) (stating: “A joint continuance is excludable”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania
v.
Darius PETERSON
No. 56 EAP 2011.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
May 23, 2012.
44 A.3d 655
Karl Baker, Jeffrey P. Shender, Rebecca Braglio, Defender Association of Philadelphia, for Darius Peterson., Hugh J. Burns, Jr., Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office, Philadelphia, Max Kaufman, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Baer, Castille, Eakin, McCaffery, Melvin, Saylor, Todd.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2012, the order of the Superior Court is hereby AFFIRMED.