green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Keen v. Weaver
See Boggs v. Boggs, 520 U.S. 833, 850 , 117 S.Ct. 1754 , 138 L.Ed.2d 45 (1997) (reviewing cases including In re Marriage of Campa, 89 Cal.App.3d 113 , 152 Cal.Rptr. 362 (1979), dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 444 U.S. 1028 , 100 S.Ct. 696 , 62 L.Ed.2d 664 (1980), and concluding that: "[w]hether or not this [pre-REA federal common-law] extension of the definition of 'beneficiary' was consistent with the statute then in force, these authorities are not applicable in light of the REA amendments.
cited
Cited "see"
Ohm v. Ohm
See, In Re Marriage of Campa, 89 Cal. App. 3d 113 , 152 Cal. Rptr. 362 (1979), appeal dismissed, 444 U.S. 1028 , 100 S. Ct. 696 , 62 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Carpenters Pension Trust Fund for Northern California
v.
Campa
v.
Campa
No. 78-1881.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 14, 1980.
444 U.S. 1028
Cited by 5 opinions | Published
Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 1st App. Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.