green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roderick Maxie
See United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 220 (8th Cir.), cert denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986) (reviewing for plain error the district court’s rulings limiting cross-examination where no timely objection was made at trial).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Collins
See United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 220 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986). [¶ 14] The Court believes that there are no overriding reasons or unique circumstances present to warrant the granting of a separate trial to Collins.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Collins
See United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 220 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986). [¶ 14] The Court believes that there are no overriding reasons or unique circumstances present to warrant the granting of a separate trial to Collins.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Pierce
See State v. Miller, 227 Conn. 363, 370 , 630 A.2d 1315 (1993), citing State v. Fleming, 198 Conn. 255, 262-63 , 502 A.2d 886 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S. Ct. 1797 , 90 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Timothy R. Fairchild
See United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 221-22 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Harris
See State v. Fleming, 198 Conn. 255, 270 , 502 A.2d 886 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S. Ct. 1797 , 90 L.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Barrett
See State v. Fleming, 198 Conn. 255, 264 , 502 A.2d 886 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S. Ct. 1797 , 90 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Falls
See United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214 , 221- 22 (8th Cir.) (wiretapping under 18 U.S.C. § 2518 ), cert. denied sub nom., Barker et al. v. United States, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kenneth D. Lucht, United States of America v. Gary D. Apker, United States of America v. Cheryl M. Morford, United States of America v. Lovella Mauseth, United States of America v. Sandra A. Volkir, United States of America v. Lamont D. Kress, United States of America v. Rodney S. Rumsey, United States of America v. Timothy S. Egan, United States of America v. Dale Ray Haley, Also Known as Corky Haley, United States of America v. Mary Lee, Also Known as Mary Spethman, United States of America v. Robert T. Farrell
Sec. 2518 (5); see United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 224 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986). 17 In Scott, the government established probable cause that nine individuals were using a particular phone in a conspiracy to import and distribute narcotics and obtained a wiretap order that contained a provision requiring minimization.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lucht
In order to limit these intrusions and comply with the Fourth Amendment’s particularity requirement, the statute requires every order to “contain a provision that the authorization to intercept ... shall be conducted in such a way as to minimize the interception of communications not otherwise subject to interception under this chapter.” 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (5); see United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 224 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Johnson
See State v. Fleming, 198 Conn. 255, 259-63 , 502 A.2d 886 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S. Ct. 1797 , 90 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Myron R. Tallman, United States of America v. Cynthia K. Green
See United States v. Jones, 801 F.2d 304 (8th Cir.1986). 5 Likewise, we conclude that when read in a practical and common sense fashion, United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 221 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986), the affidavit satisfied the requirement of 18 U.S.C. § 2518 (3)(c) that the issuing judicial officer be able to determine from the application that normal investigative procedures had been tried and had failed and that it reasonably appeared that such procedures would be unlikely to succeed if tried.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lucci
See State v. Fleming, 198 Conn. 255, 265 , 502 A.2d 886 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S. Ct. 1797 , 90 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul H. Jones, United States of America v. Richard L. Jones, United States of America v. Toni Palazzolo, United States of America v. J.W. Philyaw, United States of America v. Michael J. Palazzolo
See United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 220 (8th Cir.) ("Appellants must show that the denial of severance clearly and actually prejudiced them."), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986). 19 We are not persuaded that joinder of the offenses resulted in real prejudice.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael R. Davis, United States of America v. William W. Harris
See United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 220 (8th Cir.) (“Appellants must show that the denial of severance clearly and actually prejudiced them.”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jones
See United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 220 (8th Cir.) (“Appellants must show that the denial of severance clearly and actually prejudiced them.”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Ruiz-Vargas A/K/A William Ruiz A/K/A Willie Ruiz
See United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 228 (8th Cir.) (defendant must present clear and convincing case of abuse of discretion or patent violation of constitutional guarantee to warrant setting aside sentence), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Elmer Mims, United States of America v. Franklin Michael Einfeldt, United States of America v. Le Minh Thanh, United States of America v. Roger W. Techau, United States of America v. Burdell Doolin
See United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 220 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mims
See United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 220 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Ostroski
See State v. Fleming, 198 Conn. 255 , 502 A.2d 886 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S. Ct. 1797 , 90 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose A. Garcia, United States of America v. Thomas W. Barker, United States of America v. Dana G. Stephenson, United States of America v. Thomas Lawrence, United States of America v. Roberto Trelles
See 106 S.Ct. 1797 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Custodio
See, e.g., State v. Fleming, 198 Conn. 255, 259-63 , 502 A.2d 886 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S. Ct. 1797 , 90 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Therrien
See, e.g., State v. Fleming, 198 Conn. 255, 259-63 , 502 A.2d 886 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S. Ct. 1797 , 90 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. James
Furthermore, “[ujnder Connecticut law, a defendant may be convicted as an accessory even though he was charged only as a principal as long as the evidence presented at trial is sufficient to establish accessorial conduct.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Williams, 220 Conn. 385, 388 , 599 A.2d 1053 (1991); see also State v. Fleming, 198 Conn. 255 , 268 n.15, 502 A.2d 886 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S. Ct. 1797 , 90 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eugene H. Mathison, United States of America v. Perry Gobel, United States of America v. Robert E. Holmes, United States of America v. Dean G. Chambers
Mr. Mathison argues that the affiant in his case intentionally included false statements and omitted exculpatory ones. 20 We agree with the trial court that Mr. Mathison was not entitled to a Franks hearing because he did not make "a substantial preliminary showing that a false statement knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, was included by the affiant in the warrant affidavit." Franks, 438 U.S. at 155-56 , 98 S.Ct. 2674 ; see also United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 222 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eugene H. Mathison
We agree with the trial court that Mr. Mathison was not entitled to a Franks hearing because he did not make “a substantial preliminary showing that a false statement knowingly and intentionally, or with reckless disregard for the truth, was included by the affiant in the warrant affidavit.” Franks, 438 U.S. at 155-56 , 98 S.Ct. 2674 ; see also United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 222 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gruber
See e.g., United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214 , 222 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986); United States v. Leisure, 844 F.2d 1347 , 1357 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 932 , 109 S.Ct. 324 , 102 L.Ed.2d 342 (1988); United States v. Ippolito, 774 F.2d 1482, 1485 (9th Cir. 1985); United States v. Brooklier, 685 F.2d 1208, 1221 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1206 , 103 S.Ct. 1194 , 75 L.Ed.2d 439 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Solek
Moreover, “[u]nder Connecticut law, a defendant may be convicted as an accessory even though he was charged only as a principal as long as the evidence presented at trial is sufficient to establish accessorial conduct.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Williams, 220 Conn. 385, 388 , 599 A.2d 1053 (1991); see also State v. Fleming, 198 Conn. 255 , 268 n.15, 502 A.2d 886 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S. Ct. 1797 , 90 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ferrara
See e.g., United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 222 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986); United States v. Leisure, 844 F.2d 1347, 1357 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 932 , 109 S.Ct. 324 , 102 L.Ed.2d 342 (1988); United States v. Ippolito, 774 F.2d 1482, 1485 (9th Cir.1985); United States v. Brooklier, 685 F.2d 1208, 1221 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam), cert. denied 459 U.S. 1206 , 103 S.Ct. 1194 , 1195, 75 L.Ed.2d 439 (1983); United States v. Marcello, 508 F.Supp. 586, 603-06 (E.D.La.1981), aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Manes
(2×)
See also United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 224 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986); United States v. Van Horn, 789 F.2d 1492, 1502 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 854 , 107 S.Ct. 190 , 93 L.Ed.2d 123 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony J. Leisure, United States of America v. Charles M. Loewe, United States of America v. David R. Leisure, United States of America v. Paul John Leisure, A/K/A John Paul Leisure, United States of America v. Steven T. Wougamon
Although electronic surveillance must be necessary and reasonable, "investigators need not exhaust specific or all possible investigative techniques before a court can issue a wiretap order." United States v. Jones, 801 F.2d 304, 314 (8th Cir.1986); see also United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 223 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Brown
Compare State v. Fleming, 198 Conn. 255, 260-63 , 502 A.2d 886 , cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S. Ct. 1797 , 90 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Leisure
Although electronic surveillance must be necessary and reasonable, “investigators need not exhaust specific or all possible investigative techniques before a court can issue a wiretap order.” United States v. Jones, 801 F.2d 304, 314 (8th Cir.1986); see also United States v. Garcia, 785 F.2d 214, 223 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143 , 106 S.Ct. 1797 , 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Spann
v.
Clark
v.
Clark
No. 85-6541.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 28, 1986.
Published
Ct. App. Ga. Certiorari denied.