Remeta v. Stovall, 523 U.S. 1055 (1998). · Go Syfert
Remeta v. Stovall, 523 U.S. 1055 (1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “Minnesota v. Philip Morris ”
226 citation events (204 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. (dcd, 2006-08-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 38 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
D.D.C. · 2006 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
minnesota v. philip morris
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Decaro
Conn. · 2000 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
forming impressions and intuitions regarding witnesses is the quintessential jury function
cited Cited "see" J. B. v. C. B.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2026 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 80–90, 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Dabate
Conn. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 80–90, 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Juan A. G.-P.
Conn. · 2023 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 120 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997) (‘‘forming impressions and intuitions regarding witnesses is the quintessential jury function’’), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Raynor
Conn. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 80–90, 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Hargett
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Patel
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See footnote 31 of this opinion. 2 See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Patel
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See footnote 31 of this opinion. 2 See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" Demaria v. City of Bridgeport
Conn. App. Ct. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter , 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.Ed. 2d 645 (1998).
cited Cited "see" State v. Rogers
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter , 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S.Ct. 1384 , 140 L.Ed. 2d 645 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jackson (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter , 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S.Ct. 1384 , 140 L.Ed. 2d 645 (1998).Following our Supreme Court's decision in State v. Edwards , 325 Conn. 97 , 156 A.3d 506 (2017), the defendant filed a supplemental brief setting forth this claim.
discussed Cited "see" Bennett v. Commissioner of Correction (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Conn. App. Ct. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter , 241 Conn. 57 , 80-90, 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S.Ct. 1384 , 140 L.Ed. 2d 645 (1998).
cited Cited "see" Weaving v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter , 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S.Ct. 1384 , 140 L.Ed.2d 645 (1998).
cited Cited "see" State v. Steele
Conn. App. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter , 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S.Ct. 1384 , 140 L.Ed.2d 645 (1998).
cited Cited "see" State v. Rivera
Conn. App. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter , 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S.Ct. 1384 , 140 L.Ed.2d 645 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" Modaffari v. Greenwich Hospital
Conn. App. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 93–94, 698 A.2d 739 (1997) (concluding polygraph evidence is per se inad- missible in Connecticut courts where rules of evidence apply), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Collin
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 80–90, 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Martinez
Conn. App. Ct. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Coccomo (2×)
Conn. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
The dissent specifically contends that the defendant preserved her claim when she filed her motion for a Porter hearing; see State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S.Ct. 1384 , 140 L.Ed.2d 645 (1998); challenging the admission of the blood test results on chain of custody grounds, and when she subsequently appealed to the Appellate Court from the trial court's decision to admit those results.
cited Cited "see" Har v. Boreiko
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
examined Cited "see" State v. Marquez (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Conn. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 94-95 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S.Ct. 1384 , 140 L.Ed.2d 645 (1998).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Johnson
Conn. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 120 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997) (“forming impressions and intuitions regarding witnesses is the quintessential jury function”), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. WILLIAM C.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Necaise, 97 Conn. App. 214 , 232 n.14, 904 A.2d 245 , cert. denied, 280 Conn. 942 , 912 A.2d 478 (2006). 12 With respect to the polygraph test, “polygraph evidence [is] per se inadmissible in all trial court proceedings in which the rules of evidence apply, and for all trial purposes, in Connecticut courts.” State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 94 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" Viera v. Cohen
Conn. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. THEOFERLIUS D.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 93-94 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Antonio A.
Conn. App. Ct. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 93-94 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" Towbin v. Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 61 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Morgan
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 133-34 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Philip Morris Inc.
D.D.C. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Philip Morris, Inc. v. Minnesota, 523 U.S. 1056 , 118 S.Ct. 1384 , 140 L.Ed.2d 643 (1998).
cited Cited "see" State v. Faraday
Conn. App. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 59 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" State v. Lomax
Conn. App. Ct. · 2000 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 133 n.77, 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see" United States v. Mejia
11th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mejia v. United States, — U.S.-, 118 S.Ct. 1384 , 140 L.Ed.2d 643 (1998).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Brandon
Conn. · 2023 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Victor O., 301 Conn. 163, 174 , 20 A.3d 669 (‘‘[r]ecognizing the indefiniteness inherent in applying [the] multifactor approach [under the test set forth in State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Landmark Investment Group, LLC v. CALCO Construction & Development Co.
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 83 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997) (‘‘[o]nce the methodology underlying an expert conclusion has been sufficiently established, the mere fact that controversy . . . surrounds [the expert’s] conclusion goes only to the weight, and not to the admissibility, of such testimony’’), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Lapointe v. Commissioner of Correction
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57, 74 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Campbell
Conn. App. Ct. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Generally, expert testimony is admissible if (1) the witness has a special skill or knowledge directly applicable to a matter in issue, (2) that skill or knowledge is not common to the average person, and (3) the testimony would be helpful to the court or jury in considering the issues.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Iban C., 275 Conn. 624, 634 , 881 A.2d 1005 (2005); see also Conn. Code Evid. § 7-2 (“[a] witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, education or otherwise may testify in the form of an opinion or otherwise conc…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State of Connecticut v. Hall
Conn. App. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see also · confidence low
The defendant acknowledges that the state is no longer required to adduce evidence to satisfy the *55 first prong for the horizontal gaze nystagmus test; see State v. Commins, 83 Conn. App. 496, 503-505 , 850 A.2d 1074 (2004), aff'd, 276 Conn. 503 , 886 A.2d 824 (2005); see also State v. Balbi, supra, 576-77 (concluding that determination in Commins that horizontal gaze nystagmus evidence satisfied requirements of State v. Porter, 241 Conn. 57 , 698 A.2d 739 (1997) (en banc), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1058 , 118 S. Ct. 1384 , 140 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Remeta
v.
Stovall, Attorney General of Kansas
No. 97-8493 (A-721).
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 30, 1998.
523 U.S. 1055

C. A. 10th Cir. Application for stay of execution of sentence of death, presented to Justice Breyer, and by him referred to the Court, denied. Certiorari denied.