green
Positive treatment
2.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 2000 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2000
2013
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Blomkest Fertilizer, Inc. v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc.
See In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litig., 186 F.3d 781, 787-88 (7th Cir.1999), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 120 S.Ct. 1220 , — L.Ed.2d — (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Tierney & Black, Inc. v. Siemens Power Corp.
See, e.g., Security Watch, Inc. v. Sentinel Systems, Inc., 176 F.3d 369, 376 (6th Cir.1999) (refusing to consider a point not addressed in the defendants’ brief), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1181 , 120 S.Ct. 1220 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1120 (2000).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bell Atlantic v. MCI
See Alden, 527 U.S. at 712-13 ; Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho, 521 U.S. 261, 267-68 (1997); Seminole Tribe, 517 U.S. at 54 ; see also Litman v. George Mason Univ., 186 F.3d 544, 549 (4th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 1220 (2000); Cre- ative Goldsmiths, Inc. v. Maryland, 119 F.3d 1140, 1144 (4th Cir. 1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alexander v. Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Co.
For example, “[w]hen circumstantial evidence is used, there must be some evidence that ‘tends to exclude the possibility’ that the alleged conspirators acted independently.” Toys “R” Us, Inc., v. Federal Trade Commission, 221 F.3d 928, 934 (7th Cir.2000)(Citing Monsanto and Matsushi-ta in a conspiracy that makes economic sense.); See also In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation, 186 F.3d 781, 785 (7th Cir.1999), cert. denied HJB, Inc. v. AmeriSource Corp., 528 U.S. 1181 , 120 S.Ct. 1220 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1120 (2000); Serfecz v. Jewel Food Stores, et al, 67 F.3d 591, 59…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bell Atlantic Maryland, Inc. v. MCI Worldcom, Inc.
See Alden, 527 U.S. at 712-13 , 119 S.Ct. 2240 ; Idaho v. Coeur d’Alene Tribe of Idaho, 521 U.S. 261, 267-68 , 117 S.Ct. 2028 , 138 L.Ed.2d 438 (1997); Seminole Tribe, 517 U.S. at 54 , 116 S.Ct. 1114 ; see also hitman v. George Mason Univ., 186 F.3d 544 , 549 (4th Cir.1999), cert. denied, 528 U.S. 1181 , 120 S.Ct. 1220 , 145 L.Ed.2d 1120 (2000); Creative Goldsmiths, Inc. v. Maryland, 119 F.3d 1140, 1144 (4th Cir.1997).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bell Atlantic Maryland, Incorporated v. MCI Worldcom, Incorporated American Communications Services of Maryland, Incorporated Rcn Telecom Services of Maryland, Incorporated Starpower Communications, LLC Tcg Maryland McImetro Access Transmission Services, Incorporated the Public Service Commission of Maryland Glenn F. Ivey, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Public Service Commission of Maryland Claude M. Ligon, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission of Maryland E. Mason Hendrickson, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission of Maryland Susan Brogan, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission of Maryland Catherine I. Riley, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission of Maryland, United States of America, Intervenor/defendant-Appellee, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Bell Atlantic Maryland, Incorporated, and United States of America, Intervenor v. The Public Service Commission of Maryland Glenn F. Ivey, in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Public Service Commission of Maryland Claude M. Ligon, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission of Maryland E. Mason Hendrickson, in His Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission of Maryland Susan Brogan, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission of Maryland Catherine I. Riley, in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Public Service Commission of Maryland, and American Communications Services of Maryland, Incorporated Rcn Telecom Services of Maryland, Incorporated Starpower Communications, LLC Tcgmaryland McImetro Access Transmission Services, Incorporated Maryland Office of People's Counsel MCI Worldcom, Incorporated
See Alden, 527 U.S. at 712-13 ; Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho, 521 U.S. 261, 267-68 (1997); Seminole Tribe, 517 U.S. at 54 ; see also Litman v. George Mason Univ., 186 F.3d 544, 549 (4th Cir. 1999), cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 1220 (2000); Creative Goldsmiths, Inc. v. Maryland, 119 F.3d 1140, 1144 (4th Cir. 1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
v.
Security Watch, Inc.
v.
Security Watch, Inc.
No. 99-669.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 22, 2000.
Consideration, Took.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice O’Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.