Chanthunya v. Md. Attorney Grievance Comm'n, 139 S. Ct. 640 (2018). · Go Syfert
Search
Chanthunya v. Md. Attorney Grievance Comm'n, 139 S. Ct. 640 (2018). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
22 citation events (22 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Mitchem v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (wawd, 2020-01-08)
Treatment trajectory · 2019 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2019 2022 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Mitchem v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
W.D. Wash. · 2020 · confidence medium
While Plaintiff cite authorities for the proposition that 1 “a previously deceived plaintiff may have standing to seek injunctive relief,” Davidson v. 2 Kimberly-Clark Corp., 889 F.3d 956, 970 (9th Cir. 2018), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 640 3 (2018), Plaintiffs’ only evidence in support of their position is a declaration by Mitchem, 4 Dkt. 46 at 260.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." In re: Brinker Data Incident Litigation
M.D. Fla. · 2020 · signal: see also · confidence low
Fla. 2015) (“Although the FDUTPA allows a plaintiff to pursue injunctive relief even where the individual plaintiff will not benefit from an injunction, it cannot supplant Constitutional standing requirements.” (citation omitted)); see also, e.g., Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 889 F.3d 956, 967 (9th Cir.) (analyzing whether plaintiffs had alleged a sufficient Article III injury in fact based on future harm to seek injunctive relief under California’s UCL), cert. denied, 139 S. Ct. 640 (2018).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alexander Manjanja CHANTHUNYA
v.
MARYLAND ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION.
No. 18–5843..
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 10, 2018.
139 S. Ct. 640
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Maryland denied.