United States v. Shields, 401 U.S. 1007 (1971). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Shields, 401 U.S. 1007 (1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
75 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 41 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Romeo v. Sherry (nyed, 2004-03-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971 1998 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Romeo v. Sherry
E.D.N.Y · 2004 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 401 U.S. 321, 331-32 , 91 S.Ct. 795 , 28 L.Ed.2d 77 , reh’g denied, 401 U.S. 1015 , 91 S.Ct. 1247 , 28 L.Ed.2d 552 (1971); Matthew Bender & Co., Inc. v. West Publ’g Co., 158 F.3d 674, 679 (2d Cir.1998) (“A district court’s decision to reopen the proof to allow a party to submit additional evidence is subject to its sound discretion”); Dow Chem.
discussed Cited "see" John v. Sotheby's, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 401 U.S. 321, 331-32 , 91 S.Ct. 795, 802-03 , 28 L.Ed.2d 77 , reh’g denied, 401 U.S. 1015 , 91 S.Ct. 1247 , 28 L.Ed.2d 552 (1971); Air et Chaleur, S.A. v. Janeway, 757 F.2d 489, 495 (2d Cir.1985); B.V.
discussed Cited "see" Miller v. Beneficial Management Corp.
D.N.J. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
Rich Housing, Inc. v. Government of the Virgin Islands, 455 U.S. 1018 , 102 S.Ct. 1714 , 72 L.Ed.2d 136 (1982); Paton v. La Prade, 524 F.2d 862, 875 (3d Cir.1975) (“[Ajbsent resultant prejudice to the opposing party or similar reasons, leave to amend should be freely granted.”); see Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 401 U.S. 321, 330-31 , 91 S.Ct. 795, 802-03 , 28 L.Ed.2d 77 (finding amendment impermissible primarily on ground of prejudice to non-moving party), reh. denied, 401 U.S. 1015 , 91 S.Ct. 1247 , 28 L.Ed.2d 552 (1971).
cited Cited "see" Rufenacht v. Russell (In Re Rufenacht, Bromagen, & Hertz, Inc.)
D. Kan. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, 401 U.S. 321, 330 , 91 S.Ct. 795, 802 , 28 L.Ed.2d 77 (1971), reh’g denied, 401 U.S. 1015 , 91 S.Ct. 1247 , 28 L.Ed.2d 552 .
cited Cited "see" First Virginia Bank v. McClellan (In Re McClellan)
Bankr. E.D. Va. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, 401 U.S. 321, 330 , 91 S.Ct. 795, 802 , 28 L.Ed.2d 77 , reh’g. denied, 401 U.S. 1015 , 91 S.Ct. 1247 , 28 L.Ed.2d 552 (1971).
discussed Cited "see" American Air Filter Co. v. Industrial Decking & Roofing Corp.
E.D. Tenn. · 1979 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research (1971), 401 U.S. 321, 330 , 91 S.Ct. 795, 802 , 28 L.Ed.2d 77, 87 [3-5], rehearing denied (1971), 401 U.S. 1015 , 91 S.Ct. 1247 , 28 L.Ed.2d 552 ; Senter v. General Motor Corp., C.A. 6th (1976), 532 F.2d 511, 530 [43], certiorari denied (1976), 429 U.S. 870 , 97 S.Ct. 182 , 50 L.Ed.2d 150 ; United States v. Masonry Cont.
cited Cited "see" Walsh v. Butcher & Sherrerd
E.D. Pa. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 401 U.S. 321, 330-31 , 91 S.Ct. 1247 , 28 L.Ed.2d 552 (1971). 1 .
cited Cited "see" Carlos E. Sanchez v. Gordon W. Heggie, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary
10th Cir. · 1976 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Doty v. United States, 416 F.2d 887 (10th Cir. 1968), vacated in part sub nom., 401 U.S. 1006 , 91 S.Ct. 1247 , 28 L.Ed.2d 542 . 2 .
discussed Cited "see" Wiederhold v. Elgin, Joliet and Eastern Railway Co.
N.D. Ind. · 1974 · signal: see · confidence high
See Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 401 U.S. 321 , 91 S.Ct. 795 , 28 L.Ed.2d 77 , rehearing denied, 401 U.S. 1015 , 91 S.Ct. 1247 , 28 L.Ed.2d 552 (1971); McKenna v. Austin, 77 U.S.App.D.C. 228 , 134 F.2d 659 (1943); Prosser, supra at 270-72; Annot., 73 A.L.R.2d 403 , 407 (1960).
discussed Cited "see" Whitfield v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
D. Maryland · 1973 · signal: see · confidence high
See Somerville v. Illinois, 401 U.S. 1007 , 91 S.Ct. 1250 , 28 L.Ed.2d 543 (1971), in which, in the course of granting certiorari, the Court stated: “* * * judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration,” citing Jorn and Downum v. United States, 372 U.S. 734 , 83 S.Ct. 1033 , 10 L.Ed.2d 100 (1963). 6 Additionally, all nine of the federal courts which have considered the impact of Jorn have followed Mr. Justice Harlan’s teaching in Jorn , without in any way denigrating its status. 7 Further, in any event, the weight to be given the Jorn plurality opinion i…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Glass (2×)
Alaska · 1978 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Doty v. United States, 416 F.2d 887 (10th Cir.1968), vacated and remanded with instructions to dismiss, sub nom., Epps v. United States, 401 U.S. 1006 , 91 S.Ct. 1247 , 28 L.Ed.2d 542 (1971). [11] 405 F.2d 840 (7th Cir.), aff'd en banc, 405 F.2d 838 (1969). [12] We may construe Alaska's constitutional provisions as affording additional rights.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Shields
No. 72.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 5, 1971.
401 U.S. 1007
Douglas.
Published

C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris granted. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for reconsideration in light of Gillette v. United States, and Negre v. Larsen, ante, p. 437.

Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.