green
Positive treatment
0.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Green v. Rountree
See also Parker v. Salmons, 113 Ga. 1167 (3) ( 39 S. E. 475 ), in -which it is true that the court’s ruling was perhaps placed on the omission of proof of the correctness of the plat (which is supplied in the case at bar), but in which it was ■held to be erroneous to admit in evidence a plat purporting to be a division of certain land, which had entered thereon writing which was, in effect, a certificate from a private person identifying it as certain land described in a deed.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wellmaker, executors
v.
Wellmaker
v.
Wellmaker
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jul 24, 1901.
Colley & Sims, for plaintiffs., Thomas JE. Watson and John T. West, contra.
Little.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Little, J.
The facts, that one who while indebted was possessed of a considerable amount of land had from time to time, prior to the institution of a suit against him, conveyed to his children, separately, particular parts of such land, and subsequently sold the balance to his wife and son-in-law, do not, without more, render void a voluntary conveyance made to one of his daughters a considerable time prior to the sale, when it also appears that at the date of such conveyance the grantor reserved to himself land sufficient to pay off his indebtedness.
The trial judge did not err in directing a verdict for the claimant.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concurring.