green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1916 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1916
1971
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Jeff Davis County v. Atlanta National Bank
See, in this connection, Wilson v. Gaston, 141 Ga. 770 ( 82 S. E. 136 ); Wright v. Southern Ry.
discussed
Cited "see"
Citizens Bank v. Rockdale County
See Wilson v. Gaston, 141 Ga. 770 ( 82 S. E. 136 ); Monk v. Moultrie, 145 Ga. 843, 845 ( 90 S. E. 71 ); Wright v. Southern Railway Co., 146 Ga. 581 ( 91 S. E. 681 ); Mayor &c. of Hogansville v. Planters Bank, 147 Ga. 346 ( 94 S. E. 310 ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
San Miguel, González & Valiente & Co. v. Municipality of Caguas
See also Wilson v. Gaston, 141 Ga. 770 , 82 S. E. 136 ; School Dist.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Moss
v.
Moss, administrator
v.
Moss, administrator
Supreme Court of Georgia.
Jun 10, 1914.
Henry IFalicer, for plaintiff in error. McHenry & Porter, contra.
Beck.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Beck, J.
It appearing, from the recitals in the bill of exceptions and from the record in this case, that the question as to whether the court properly granted an injunction at the interlocutory hearing depends upon a consideration of the evidence introduced at the hearing, and it further appearing that the evidence is neither set forth literally or in substance in the bill of exceptions nor" attached thereto as an exhibit, and that there is no brief of the evidence approved by the trial judge and made[*770] a part of the record, this court can not say that the’ court below erred ' idn granting the interlocutory injunction.
June 10, 1914. Injunction. Before Judge Wright. Floyd superior court. November 5, 1913. Henry IFalicer, for plaintiff in error. McHenry & Porter, contra.Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concur.