green
Positive treatment
8.3 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Frank D. Frazer v. State of South Carolina Henry Dargan McMaster Attorney General for South Carolina
(2×)
In South Carolina, “the denial of a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals does not dismiss or decide the underlying appeal; it simply determines that, as a matter of discretion, [the South Carolina Supreme Court] does not desire to review the decision of the Court of Appeals.” State v. Rucker, 321 S.C. 552 , 471 S.E.2d 145, 145 (1996) (emphasis added); see also Austin v. South Carolina, 305 S.C. 453 , 409 S.E.2d 395, 396 (1991) (reaching the same conclusion with respect to the South Carolina Supreme Court’s refusal to review the denial of post-conviction relief).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rios v. Warden, Perry Corr Inst
(2×)
See State v. Rucker, 321 S.C. 552 , 471 S.E.2d 145, 145 (S.C. 1996) (denial of a petition for a writ of certiorari “does not dismiss or decide the underlying appeal”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of William H. HENSEL
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
May 8, 1996.
Finney.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
ORDER
Respondent pled guilty to one count of failure to make and file a South Carolina Income Tax return in violation of S.C. Code Ann. § 12-54-40(b)(6)(c) (Supp. 1995). The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline asks this Court to temporarily suspend respondent from the practice of law in this State pursuant to Paragraph 6 of the Rules on Disciplinary Procedure, Rule 413, SCACR.
IT IS ORDERED that the petition is granted and respondent is temporarily suspended from the practice of law until further order of this Court.
/s/ Ernest A. Finney. Jr., C.J.FOR THE COURT