green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
D.A. v. State
See Wenz, 598 P.2d at 1092 , cert, denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980) (holding, among other things, "that personal jurisdiction over a parent is not necessary to the termination of his parental rights to a minor child, so long as the parent has actual notice of the termination proceedings or the District Court ... makes an effort reasonably calculated to provide notice to the parent”); In re Marriage of Hudson, 434 N.E.2d 107, 117-19 (Ind.Ct.App.1982 (holding that "the trial court's assertion of jurisdiction over the custody proceeding without obtaining in persona…
cited
Cited "see"
Blakeney v. Benefact Mortgage (In Re Blakeney)
See United States v. Vignola, 464 F.Supp. 1091, 1099 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 605 F.2d 1199 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1072 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. State of Missouri
See Morrilton School District No. 32 v. United States, 606 F.2d 222, 230 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980); see also Riddick v. School Board of the City of Norfolk, 784 F.2d 521, 533 (4th Cir.1986) (factual findings by a district court in school desegregation cases are entitled to great deference on review "especially where the presiding judicial officer has lived with a case for many years"). 36 The Supreme Court in Anderson v. City of Bessemer City, 470 U.S. 564 , 105 S.Ct. 1504 , 84 L.Ed.2d 518 (1985), has explained that the trial judge's r…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jenkins v. Missouri
See Morrilton School District No. 32 v. United States, 606 F.2d 222, 230 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980); see also Riddick v. School Board of the City of Norfolk, 784 F.2d 521, 533 (4th Cir.1986) (factual findings by a district court in school desegregation cases are entitled to great deference on review “especially where the presiding judicial officer has lived with a case for many years”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Child Protection Group v. Cline
See Providence Journal Co. v. F.B.I., 460 F.Supp. 778, 787 (D.R.I.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 602 F.2d 1010 (1st Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Arkansas
See Morrilton School District No. 32 v. United States, 606 F.2d 222 (8th Cir.1979) (en banc), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980); Morrilton School District No. 32 v. United States, 606 F.2d 222 (8th Cir.1979) (order granting leave to take interlocutory appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. State of Arkansas Arkansas Department of Education, Dr. Don R. Roberts, Director Wayne Hartsfield, Chairman Jim Dupree T.C. Cogbill, Jr. Rabie Rhodes Dr. John W. Cole Harry A. Haines Rev. Emery Washington Jack E. Meadows and Dr. Ellis Gardner, Nemo Vista School District and South Conway County School District, Conway County Board of Education Ernest L. Rankin, Secretary J.D. Barnum, B. Jack Wilson Leon Cowan Fred Burnett and James E. Leach, Members East Side School District No. 5, Peter Faison, Superintendent Cain Cochran J.D. Hammond Rupert Hemphill Ladel Morris and Sammie Chriswell, Members Nemo Vista School District No. 8, T.O. Adams, Superintendent Haven Mahon Clyde Stobaugh J v. Ward J.M. Carr and Henry Huett, Members Wonderview School District No. 2, John Dunsworth, Superintendent Tony Rowell Bill Alvey Wayland Duvall James Wells Don Hillis and Doyle Franklin, Members, Conway County School District No. 1 Tony L. Desalvo Stanley McCoy Tommy Lee Leroy Rainey and R.E. Mitchum, Members Ernest Rankin, Ex-Officio Secretary. United States of America v. State of Arkansas Arkansas Department of Education, Dr. Don R. Roberts, Director Wayne Hartsfield, Chairman Jim Dupree T.C. Cobgill, Jr. Rabie Rhodes Dr. John W. Cole Harry A. Haines Rev. Emery Washington Jack E. Meadows and Dr. Ellis Gardner, Nemo Vista School District and South Conway County School District, Conway County Board of Education Ernest L. Rankin, Secretary J.D. Barnum, B. Jack Wilson Leon Cowan Fred Burnett and James E. Leach, Members East Side School District No. 5, Peter Faison, Superintendent Cain Cochran J.D. Hammond Rupert Hemphill Ladel Morris and Sammie Chriswell, Members Nemo Vista School District No. 8, T.O. Adams, Superintendent Haven Mahon Clyde Stobaugh J v. Ward J.M. Carr and Henry Huett, Members Wonderview School District No. 2, John Dunsworth, Superintendent Tony Rowell Bill Alvey Wayland Duvall James Wells Don Hillis and Doyle Franklin, Members, Conway County School District No. 1 Tony L. Desalvo Stanley McCoy Tommy Lee Leroy Rainey and R.E. Mitchum, Members Ernest Rankin, Ex-Officio Secretary
See Morrilton School District No. 32 v. United States, 606 F.2d 222 (8th Cir.1979) (en banc ), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980); Morrilton School District No. 32 v. United States, 606 F.2d 222 (8th Cir.1979) (order granting leave to take interlocutory appeal).
discussed
Cited "see"
Marzen v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
See Providence Journal Co. v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 460 F.Supp. 778 , 789-91 n. 52 (D.R.I.1978), rev’d on other grounds, 602 F.2d 1010 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980); Congressional News-Syndicate v. United States Department of Justice, 438 F.Supp. 538 , 542 n. 2, 543 (D.D.C.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
Spaulding v. Spaulding
See Wenz v. Schwartze, 183 Mont. 166 , 598 P.2d 1086, 1095 (Mont.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980); Priscilla S. v. Albert B., 102 Misc.2d 650 , 424 N.Y.S.2d 613 (Fam.Ct.1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dickens, Albert, United States of America v. Pittman, Fred, Jr., United States of America v. Washington, James, United States of America v. Persons, Lonnie, United States of America v. Upshaw, Dewey, United States of America v. Cooper, Robert, Robert Cooper, A/K/A Mubarak Rai Ali, United States of America v. Monroe, Keith, United States of America v. Conerly, Alvin, Alvin Conerly, Also Known as Hijr, United States of America v. Lawson, Willie Lee, Willie Lee Lawson, A/K/A Acqueel, United States of America v. Grey, Claude, Ahmed Muhammad, A/K/A Claude Grey, United States of America v. Skinner, Raymond, Raymond Skinner, Also Known as Rafeeq, United States of America v. Thompson, Walton Earl, United States of America v. Clark, James, United States of America v. Brunson, James, United States of America v. Kreps, Sheldon, United States of America v. Moses, Rosco, United States of America v. Dickens, Ronald
See United States v. Vignola, 464 F.Supp. 1091 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd, 605 F.2d 1199 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1072 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Dickens
See United States v. Vignola, 464 F.Supp. 1091 (E.D.Pa.), aff’d, 605 F.2d 1199 (3d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1072 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cryan
See United States v. Vignola, 464 F.Supp. 1091, 1097-98 (E.D.Pa.), aff'd mem., 605 F.2d 1199 (3rd Cir. 1979), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980). 9 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clift v. Narragansett Television L.P.
(2×)
See also Providence Journal Co. v. Federal Bureau of Investigation, 460 F.Supp. 778, 793 (D.R.I.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 602 F.2d 1010 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980); Restatement (Second) Torts § 652I, comments a, b (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Kerr-Mcgee Chemical Corporation
See, e.g., Honicker v. Hendrie, 465 F.Supp. 414, 419 (M.D.Tenn.1979), aff'd mem., 605 F.2d 556 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1072 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980); Paskavitch v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 458 F.Supp. 216 (D.Conn.1978); Nader v. Ray, 363 F.Supp. 946, 953 (D.D.C.1973). 48 The State of Illinois argues as amicus that primary jurisdiction is not applicable here because the plaintiffs' claims are based on state law and the NRC cannot enforce the relief requested.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brown v. Kerr-McGee Chemical Corp.
See, e.g., Honicker v. Hendrie, 465 F.Supp. 414, 419 (M.D.Tenn.1979), aff'd mem., 605 F.2d 556 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1072 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980); Paskavitch v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 458 F.Supp. 216 (D.Conn.1978); Nader v. Ray, 363 F.Supp. 946, 953 (D.D.C.1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Dubuque v. Telegraph Herald, Inc.
See, e.g., Providence Journal Co. v. F.B.I., 602 F.2d 1010 ,1014 n.8 (1st Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 752 (1980); Petkas v. Staats, 501 F.2d 887, 889 (D.C.Cir.1974); Robles v. Environmental Protection Agency, 484 F.2d 843, 846 (4th Cir. 1973); cf. Charles River Park “A”, Inc. v. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 519 F.2d 935, 940 (D.C.Cir.1975) (‘If [the information] is not found to be confidential under the [Freedom of Information Act], it must be disclosed on request even if it was submitted in confidence.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. City of Monroe
See, e. g., Morrilton School District No. 32 v. United States, 606 F.2d 222 (8th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1071 , 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980); United States v. Missouri, 515 F.2d 1365 (8th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 374 , 46 L.Ed.2d 288 (1975); Newburg Area Council, Inc. v. Board of Education, Louisville, Kentucky, 510 F.2d 1358 (6th Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 931 , 95 S.Ct. 1658 , 44 L.Ed.2d 88 (1975); Berry v. School District of City of Benton Harbor, 467 F.Supp. 721 (W.D.Mich.1978); United States v. Board of School Commissioners, 456 F…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Desrosiers v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
See also, Honicker v. Hendrie, 465 F.Supp. 414 (M.D.Tenn.), affirmed 605 F.2d 556 (6th Cir. 1979), cert. denied —- U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 1015 , 62 L.Ed.2d 753 (1980), wherein the Court in a similar action stated that, “No one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been exhausted.” The exhaustion doctrine would in any event preclude this Court from asserting jurisdiction over the plaintiff’s claim until he has completed the administrative process.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Providence Journal Co.
v.
Federal Bureau of Investigation
v.
Federal Bureau of Investigation
No. 79-673.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1980.
Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.