green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
10.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1982 ·
…a purchaser may recover only for the price increment that 'flows from' the distortion of the market caused by the monopolist's anticompetitive conduct
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Wojcieszek v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.
But see Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980)(supporting leveraging theory); Ortho Diagnostic Sys.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Intergraph Corp. v. Intel Corp.
the use of monopoly power attained in one market to gain a competitive advantage in another is a violation of 2, even if there has not been an attempt to monopolize the second market.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Picker International, Inc. v. Leavitt
before we would allow misrepresentations to buyers to be the basis of a competitor's treble damages action under 2, we would at least require the plaintiff to overcome a presumption that the effect 964 on competition of such a practice was de minimis.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Allegheny Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company v. Mid-Atlantic Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Inc.
a purchaser may recover only for the price increment that 'flows from' the distortion of the market caused by the monopolist's anticompetitive conduct
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Allegheny Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. v. Mid-Atlantic Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
a purchaser may recover only for the price increment that 'flows from' the distortion of the market caused by the monopolist's anticompetitive conduct
discussed
Cited "see"
De Kwiatkowski v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 457 F.Supp. 404, 438 (S.D.N.Y.1978), aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 603 F.2d 263 (2d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Independent Service Organizations Antitrust Litigation
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 , 274 n. 12 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Creative Copier Services v. Xerox Corp.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 , 274 n. 12 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Indep. Serv. Organizations Antitrust Lit.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 , 274 n. 12 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Re/Max International, Inc. v. Realty One, Inc.
See id., (quoting Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 275 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Glendora v. Gannett Co. Inc.
See Berkey Photo v. Eastman Kodak, 603 F.2d 263 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980), modifying the view expressed in United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F.2d 416 (2d Cir.1945).
discussed
Cited "see"
Advanced Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Giles Memorial Hospital
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 275 (2d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980). 16 The Sixth Circuit elected to follow Berkey Photo in Kerasotes Michigan Theatres, Inc. v. National Amusements Inc., 854 F.2d 135 (6th Cir.1988), cert. dismissed, 490 U.S. 1087 , 109 S.Ct. 2461 , 104 L.Ed.2d 982 (1989), but the Third and Ninth Circuit Courts of Appeal have emphatically rejected monopoly leveraging as impermissible expansions of the sweep of section 2.
cited
Cited "see"
Rosen v. Hyundai Group (Korea)
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 268 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kahn v. Kohlberg
See Taylor v. Meirick, 712 F.2d 1112, 1119 (7th Cir.1983). 86 For example, in the antitrust context, the courts hold that " 'each time that a plaintiff is injured by an act of the defendants a cause of action accrues to him to recover the damages caused by that act.' " Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 295 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980) (quoting Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc., 401 U.S. 321, 338 , 91 S.Ct. 795, 806 , 28 L.Ed.2d 77 (1971)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trans Sport, Inc. v. Starter Sportswear, Inc.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 275-276 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980); Poster Exchange, Inc. v. National Screen Service Corp., 431 F.2d 334, 339 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 912 , 91 S.Ct. 880 , 27 L.Ed.2d 811 (1971); Belfiore v. New York Times Co., 654 F.Supp. 842, 847 (D.Conn.1986) (citing R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Advanced Health-Care Services, Inc. v. Radford Community Hospital Southwest Virginia Health Enterprises, Inc. Southwest Virginia Health Services Southwest Virginia Pharmacy & Medical Company, D/B/A Community Pharmacy & Medical Supply, Advanced Health-Care Services, Inc. v. Twin County Community Hospital, D/B/A Twin County Community Hospital Durable Medical Equipment Supply Medserv Corporation, Voluntary Hospitals of America, Inc., Amicus Curiae. Advanced Health-Care Services, Inc. v. Giles Memorial Hospital Medserv Corporation Health East, Inc., Voluntary Hospitals of America, Inc., Amicus Curiae
(2×)
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak, 603 F.2d 263, 276 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980); Kerasotes Mich. Theatres v. National Amusements, Inc., 854 F.2d 135 , 137 (6th Cir.1988), cert. dismissed, --- U.S. ----, 109 S.Ct. 2461 , 104 L.Ed.2d 982 (1989); Grason Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
Advanced Health-Care Services, Inc. v. Radford Community Hospital
(2×)
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak, 603 F.2d 263, 276 (2d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980); Kerasotes Mich. Theatres v. National Amusements, Inc., 854 F.2d 135 , 137 (6th Cir.1988), cert. dismissed, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 2461 , 104 L.Ed.2d 982 (1989); Grason Elec.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Syufy Enterprises Raymond J. Syufy
(2×)
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 273-74 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980). 26 The argument government counsel presses here is a close variant of Alcoa: The government is not claiming that Syufy monopolized the market by being too efficient, but that Syufy's effectiveness as a competitor creates a structural barrier to entry, rendering illicit Syufy's acquisition of its competitors' screens.
discussed
Cited "see"
Westchester Radiological Associates P.C. v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Inc.
A legitimate buyer is entitled to use its market power to keep prices down.” *716 Id. at 929 ; see, Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 297 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980) (analogous conclusion with respect to sellers with market power).
discussed
Cited "see"
R.C. Bigelow, Inc. v. Unilever N v. Thomas J. Lipton, Inc., Celestial Seasonings, Inc., and Kraft, Inc.
While the court indicated that a post-acquisition market share of 84% was “more than sufficient to establish a prima facie showing of ‘monopoly power,’ ” 689 F.Supp. at 79 ; see United States v. Waste Management, Inc., 743 F.2d 976, 981 (2d Cir.1984), it concluded *105 that “the mere fact that Lipton will possess monopoly power after the proposed acquisition is not a sufficient showing that Lipton will exercise that power in a way that will cause injury to Bigelow.” 689 F.Supp. at 79 ; see Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 275 (2d Cir.1979) (“mere possession …
cited
Cited "see"
Winter Hill Frozen Foods & Services, Inc. v. Haagen-Dazs Co.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 , 273 n. 11 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Football League v. National Football League
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 274 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980) (even if origin of monopoly power is innocent, the maintenance or extension of market control by the exercise of such power violates § 2).
discussed
Cited "see"
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company v. Drysdale Securities Corporation
See Berkey Photo Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 279 (2d Cir.1979) (urging use of special verdicts and interrogatories in "large and complex cases" to resolve issues, reduce probability of "laborious and expensive retrial," and facilitate appellate review), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Drysdale Securities Corp.
See Berkey Photo Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 279 (2d Cir.1979) (urging use of special verdicts and interrogatories in “large and complex cases” to resolve issues, reduce probability of “laborious and expensive retrial,” and facilitate appellate review), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 , 309 n. 75 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980) (expenditures for use of computer retrieval service not recoverable as costs of suit); Litton Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Co., 613 F.Supp. 824, 836 (S.D.N.Y.1985) (costs for computerized litigation support, like word processing and Lexis costs, are not recoverable costs under Rule 54(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 1920 ).
discussed
Cited "see"
J.T. Gibbons, Inc. v. Crawford Fitting Company
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 , 309 n. 75 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 738 (1980); Ott v. Speedwriting Publishing Co., 518 F.2d 1143, 1149 (6th Cir.1975); State of Illinois v. Sangamo Construction Co., 657 F.2d 855, 864-65 (7th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Football League v. National Football League
See note 3, infra. Mr. Garvey did not allege that the NFL did anything in violation of the antitrust laws. [2] Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 296 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980), quoting United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, 148 F.2d 416, 429 (2d Cir.1945) ("the origin of a monopoly may be critical in determining its legality"). [3] In Mid-South Grizzlies , no claim was made "that abuse of NFL market power led to the demise of the World Football League." 720 F.2d at 784-85 .
cited
Cited "see"
R.C. Dick Geothermal Corp. v. Thermogenics, Inc.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 , 301 n. 66 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Ill. v. Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 275 (2nd Cir.1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980), Sargent Welch Scientific Co. v. Ventron Corp., 567 F.2d 701, 711-13 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied 439 U.S. 822 , 99 S.Ct. 87 , 58 L.Ed.2d 113 (1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Garcia v. Chase Manhattan Bank
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 278-79 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Garcia v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 278-79 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Arthur S. Langenderfer, Inc. v. S.E. Johnson Co.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 273 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Arthur Langenderfer, Inc. v. Johnson Company
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 273 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
J.H. Westerbeke Corp. v. Onan Corp.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980); Heatransfer Corp. v. Volkswagenwerk, A.G., 553 F.2d 964 (5th Cir.1977); Gradsky v. Sperry Rand Corp., 489 F.2d 502 (6th Cir.1973).
cited
Cited "see"
White and White, Inc. v. American Hospital Supply Corp.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 276 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
examined
Cited "see"
MCI Communications Corporation and MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company
(4×)
United States v. Grinnell, 384 U.S. 563, 570-71 , 86 S.Ct. 1698, 1703-1704 , 16 L.Ed.2d 778 (1966); see Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 274-76 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Interface Group, Inc. v. Gordon Publications, Inc.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 272 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Glen Eden Hospital, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
See, Berkey Photo Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 281-82 (2d Cir.1979), cert. den. 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980); Telex Corp. v. IBM Corp., 510 F.2d 894 , 927 (10th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Argus Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980); GAF Corp. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 519 F.Supp. 1203 (S.D.N.Y.1981). 4 Discussion I.
discussed
Cited "see"
City Of Groton v. The Connecticut Light & Power Co.
See generally Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 275 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980); Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., slip op. at 84-86.
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Groton v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.
See generally Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 275 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980); Northeastern Telephone Co. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., slip op. at 84-86.
discussed
Cited "see"
Broadway Delivery Corp. v. United Parcel Service of America, Inc.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 , 273 n.11 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980) (noting evidential significance of decline in market share).
cited
Cited "see"
Richter Concrete Corp. v. Hilltop Basic Resources, Inc.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 274 (2d Cir. 1979), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980); Cf., Areeda and Turner, supra, 88 Harv.L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Chatham Brass Co., Inc. v. Honeywell Inc.
See Berkey Photo v. Eastman Kodak, 603 F.2d 263, 294 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980) (purchaser of product whose price is affected by defendant’s monopolization has standing to bring Section 2 claim); cf. Reading Industries, Inc. v. Kennecott Copper Corporation, 631 F.2d 10, at 14 (2d Cir., 1980), (if allegations are that conspirators reduced would-be purchasers’ opportunity to buy by restricting output, those purchasers denied an opportunity to buy from defendants would be in the target area).
cited
Cited "see"
Official Airline Guides, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 281-82 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
City of Groton v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 , 295 96 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980). 4 .
cited
Cited "see"
American Hospital Supply Corp. v. Roy Lapidus, Inc.
See Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Mid-Texas Communications Systems, Inc. v. American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
See generally Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 271-76 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
AD/SAT v. Associated Press
Co., 708 F.2d 1081, 1128-30 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 891 , 104 S.Ct. 234 , 78 L.Ed.2d 226 (1983); see also Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263 , 287-88 & n. 41 (2d Cir.1979) (unless it amounts to deception, advertising by competitor with significant market share showing product in best light cannot be anticompetitive conduct), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Multistate Legal Studies, Inc. v. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Legal And Professional Publications, Inc.
Compare, e.g., Berkey Photo, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 603 F.2d 263, 275-76 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1093 , 100 S.Ct. 1061 , 62 L.Ed.2d 783 (1980), with Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. United Airlines, Inc., 948 F.2d 536, 546-49 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 977 , 112 S.Ct. 1603 , 118 L.Ed.2d 316 (1992).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Michigan
v.
Gardner
v.
Gardner
No. 79-943.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1980.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Mich. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.