green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.3 score
“we see no merit in the contentions that summary judgment was improper because ... an earlier motion for summary judgment, which raised the same issues, had been denied.”
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brown v. Pearson
we see no merit in the contentions that summary judgment was improper because ... an earlier motion for summary judgment, which raised the same issues, had been denied.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pereira v. Nelson (In Re Trace International Holdings, Inc.)
See Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 592 F.2d 1118, 1121 (10th Cir.)(“A second motion for summary judgment is proper after a prior motion is dismissed, if supported by new material.”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 856 , 100 S.Ct. 116 , 62 L.Ed.2d 75 (1979); Twin Lab., Inc. v. Weider Health & Fitness, 720 F.Supp. 31, 34 (S.D.N.Y. 1989)(same), aff'd, 900 F.2d 566 (2d Cir. 1990).
cited
Cited "see"
STATE MUT. LIFE ASSUR. CO. OF AM. v. Hampton
See, In re Estate of Mahoney, supra note 11, 220 A.2d at 478 and Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 592 F.2d 1118 [10th Cir.1979], cert. denied 444 U.S. 856 , 100 S.Ct. 116 , 62 L.Ed.2d 75 .
cited
Cited "see"
State Mutual Life Assurance Co. of America v. Hampton
See, In re Estate of Mahoney, supra note 11, 220 A.2d at 478 and Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 592 F.2d 1118 [10th Cir.1979], cert. denied 444 U.S. 856 , 100 S.Ct. 116 , 62 L.Ed.2d 75 .
cited
Cited "see"
Contract Custom Drapery Service, Inc. v. United States
See Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 592 F.2d 1118, 1121 (10th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 856 , 100 S.Ct. 116 , 62 L.Ed.2d 75 ; Kirby v. P.R.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stegall v. Great American Insurance
Co., 205 Kan. at 93 , 468 P.2d at 283 ; see also Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 592 F.2d 1118, 1124 (10th Cir.) cert. denied 444 U.S. 856 , 100 S.Ct. 116 , 62 L.Ed.2d 75 (1979)(under Oklahoma law, even if informant is mistaken about facts, he is insulated by full disclosure to police who make independent decision whether to charge plaintiff with crime).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nancy Millensifer v. Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees of Cotter Corporation
Colorado Property Acquisitions, Inc. v. United States, 894 F.2d 1173 , 1175 n. 5 (10th Cir.1990); see also Lindsey v. Dayton-Hudson Corp., 592 F.2d 1118, 1124 (10th Cir.) (affirming summary judgment when facts were sufficiently clear to permit a determination), cert. denied, 444 *1008 U.S. 856, 100 S.Ct. 116 , 62 L.Ed.2d 75 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ferrara
v.
Hendry County School Board
v.
Hendry County School Board
No. 78-6806.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Published
Citer courts: Court of Appeals of South Caro… (1)
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 2d Dist. Certiorari denied.