green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 2009 ·
…in our judgment the regulatory control of the bank board over federal savings and loan associations is so pervasive as to leave no room for state regulatory control.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Shea v. First Federal Savings & Loan Assn. of New Haven
But see Conference of Federal Savings & Loan Assns. v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1979), aff’d, 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S. Ct. 1304 , 63 L.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Allen v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Division of Public Assistance
in our judgment the regulatory control of the bank board over federal savings and loan associations is so pervasive as to leave no room for state regulatory control.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Allen v. STATE, DHSS., PUBLIC ASSISTANCE
in our judgment the regulatory control of the bank board over federal savings and loan associations is so pervasive as to leave no room for state regulatory control.
discussed
Cited "see"
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Commission Of California
See Conference of Federal Savings & Loan Ass'ns v. Stein, 9 Cir., 1979, 604 F.2d 1256, 1259 , aff'd mem., 1980, 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (cross claim for injunction); Rath Packing Co. v. Becker, 9 Cir., 1975, 530 F.2d 1295, 1303-1306 , aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
See Conference of Federal Savings & Loan Ass’ns v. Stein, 9 Cir., 1979, 604 F.2d 1256, 1259 , aff’d mem., 1980, 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (cross claim for injunction); Rath Packing Co. v. Becker, 9 Cir., 1975, 530 F.2d 1295, 1303-1306 , aff’d sub nom.
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth ex rel. Zimmerman v. Nickel
See, Conference of Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Stein, 604 F. 2d 1256, 1260 , aff'd 100 S.Ct. 1304 .
cited
Cited "see"
Alton Box Board Company v. Esprit De Corp.
See Conference of Federal Savings & Loan Ass’ns v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256, 1259 (9th Cir. 1979), aff’d mem., 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
FIRST FED. S & L ASS'N OF GADSDEN CTY. v. Peterson
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See, Conference of Federal Savings and Loan Associations v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1979), aff'd mem., 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
First Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Peterson
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See, Conference of Federal Savings and Loan Associations v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1979), aff’d mem., 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Provience v. Valley Clerks Trust Fund
See generally Conference of Federal Savings & Loan Ass’ns. v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256, 1260 (9th Cir. 1979), aff'd mem., 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980); Ray v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 435 U.S. 151 , 98 S.Ct. 988, 994 , 55 L.Ed.2d 179 (1978); Jones v. Rath Packing Co., 430 U.S. 519 , 97 S.Ct. 1305 , 51 L.Ed.2d 604 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lienhard v. State
See, e.g., Estate of Cargill v. City of Rochester, 119 N.H. 661, 666-68 , 406 A.2d 704, 706-08 (1979), appeal dismissed, 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980) ($50,-000 tort claim ceiling upheld); Cauley v. City of Jacksonville, 403 So.2d 379, 385-87 (Fla. 1981) ($50,000 per person and $100,000 per incident tort claim ceiling upheld); Wilson v. Gipson, 753 P.2d 1349, 1351-53 (Okla.1988) ($50,000 per person and $300,000 tort claim ceiling upheld, and reviewing cases from other jurisdictions).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State, Department of Banking & Finance ex rel. Lewis v. Standard Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
See also, Conference of Federal Savings & Loan Associations v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir.1979), affd. 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Otero Savings and Loan Association, a Colorado Corporation v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board and Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation
(2×)
See also Conference of Federal Savings and Loan Associations v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256, 1260 (9th Cir.), aff’d 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (state agencies have no enforcement power over federal savings and loan associations).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dantus v. FIRST FEDERAL SAV. & LOAN ASS'N
See, e. g., Conference of Federal Savings and Loan Associations v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1979), aff'd mem., 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980); Meyers v. Beverly Hills Federal Savings & Loan Association, 499 F.2d 1145 (9th Cir. 1974); Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Assoc. v. Fox, 459 F.Supp. 903 (C.D.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dantus v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
See, e. g., Conference of Federal Savings and Loan Associations v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1979), aff’d mem., 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980); Meyers v. Beverly Hills Federal Savings & Loan Association, 499 F.2d 1145 (9th Cir. 1974); Glendale Federal Savings & Loan Assoc. v. Fox, 459 F.Supp. 903 (C.D.Cal.1978); Haugen v. Western Federal Savings and Loan Association of Denver, No. 79CV4680 (Colo.Dist.Ct.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smart v. First Federal S & L Ass'n of Detroit
See, e. g., Conference of Federal Savings and Loan Associations v. Stein, 604 F.2d 1256 (9th Cir. 1979), aff’d. by order, 445 U.S. 921 , 100 S.Ct. 1304 , 63 L.Ed.2d 754 (1980); and First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Boston v. Greenwald, 591 F.2d 417 , 423 n.8 (1st Cir. 1979) (questioning removal jurisdiction but finding, in a cursory footnote, that the court had declaratory judgment jurisdiction).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cargill, Administrator
v.
City of Rochester, New Hampshire
v.
City of Rochester, New Hampshire
No. 79-996.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 17, 1980.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Alaska Supreme Court (2)
Appeal from Sup. Ct. N. H. dismissed for want of jurisdiction.