green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
7.1 score
“importers, wholesalers, purchasers of cutting materials, and persons who 'wash' money are all as necessary to the success of the venture as is the retailer. they can all be held to have agreed with one another in what has been called a 'chain' conspiracy.”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Gambino
an informant, whether paid or not, is simply not a government 'agent' within the meaning of search and seizure law.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Evans
importers, wholesalers, purchasers of cutting materials, and persons who 'wash' money are all as necessary to the success of the venture as is the retailer. they can all be held to have agreed with one another in what has been called a 'chain' conspiracy.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Feola
thus, the rule is clear that absent a showing that himself had knowingly included false statements in his affidavit, there is a basis neither for a hearing nor for suppression itself.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Hilda Escobar De Bright
he government showed that involvement was more far-ranging than simply having conspired with government agents, for which no conspiratorial liability could be imposed.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gigante
See United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 141 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980)(use of anonymous jury to protect the jurors and their impartiality); see also Nancy Gertner and Judith H.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Taylor
See [Raddatz, 447 U.S.] at 681, n. 7 [100 S.Ct. at 2415 n. 7], Peretz, 501 U.S. at 939 , 111 S.Ct. at 2671 (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Taylor
See [Raddatz, 447 U.S.] at 681, n. 7 [100 S.Ct. at 2415 n. 7]. 65 Peretz, 501 U.S. at 939 , 111 S.Ct. at 2671 (citation omitted). 66 In United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667 , 100 S.Ct. 2406 , 65 L.Ed.2d 424 (1980), the Supreme Court had addressed the situation where the district court reviews de novo a magistrate's determination that involved credibility findings.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Steven Reed
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See United States v. Gaultney, 581 F.2d 1137, 1144 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 259 (1980) (citing United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1 , 97 S.Ct. 2476 , 53 L.Ed.2d 538 (1977)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gaind
See United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 151 (2d Cir.1979), ce rt. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Pasciuti
See United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 141 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 [ 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 ] (1980) (holding that use of an anonymous jury did not deprive defendants of the right to probe meaningfully juror’s potential biases); United States v. Thomas, supra, 757 F.2d at 1364-65 ; United States v. Persico, 621 F.Supp. 842, 878 (D.C.N.Y.1985) (conducting a searching voir dire alleviated the risk that providing jurors with anonymity would cast unfair aspersions on defendants), aff'd, 832 F.2d 705 (2d Cir.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Piedrahita
See United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 161 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980); see also United States v. Giunta, 925 F.2d 758, 764 (4th Cir.1991); United States v. Manotas-Mejia, 824 F.2d 360, 365 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 957 , 108 S.Ct. 354 , 98 L.Ed.2d 379 (1987); United States v. Giry, 818 F.2d 120, 126 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 855 , 108 S.Ct. 162 , 98 L.Ed.2d 116 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. One 1987 Ford F-350 4× 4 Pickup
See U.S. v. Gaultney, 581 F.2d 1137 , 1140 n. 2 (5th Cir.1978) cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 259 (1980); U.S. v. Savides, 664 F.Supp. 1544, 1551 (N.D.Ill.1987); U.S. v. One 1971 Volvo 2-Door Sedan, 393 F.Supp. 843, 847 (C.D.Cal. 1975).
cited
Cited "see"
Siwek v. Farley
See, United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 138 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Persico
See United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 134-35, 137 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Persico
See United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 134-35, 137 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Willard Williams v. United States
See United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 156 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Francis Mariani, Louis Fargnoli, Francis Mariani, and Daniel Miller
(2×)
See United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 156 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. One 1980 Chevrolet Blazer Automobile
See United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 146 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980); United States v. Magnano, 543 F.2d 431, 437 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977); United States v. Schwartz, 535 F.2d 160, 165 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 906 , 97 S.Ct. 1175 , 51 L.Ed.2d 581 (1977); United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1105 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Angelito Maniego, Hector Galang, Teodoro Monte
See United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 150-51 (2d Cir.1979) (no prejudice from credibility testimony on direct), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980). 2.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wilson
See United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 161 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980). 50 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Shakur
See United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 152-53 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Loften
See *844 United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 146-47 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980); United States v. Viserto, 596 F.2d 531, 536 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 841 , 100 S.Ct. 80 , 62 L.Ed.2d 52 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leroy Perry, Leroy Butler, Charles Cameron, Donald Dewees, Arthur Gibbons, and Willie Earl Patterson
(2×)
See United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 154-55 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Padilla-Valenzuela
See, e.g., United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 139-43 (2nd Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980); United States v. Taylor, 562 F.2d 1345, 1355 (2nd Cir.) (educational backgrounds and whether prospective jurors had children), cert. denied sub nom., 432 U.S. 909 , 97 S.Ct. 2958 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1083 (1977); United States v. Hamling, 481 F.2d 307, 314 (9th Cir.1973) (views towards sex and obscenity), aff'd, 418 U.S. 87 , 94 S.Ct. 2887 , 41 L.Ed.2d 590 (1974); United States v. Workman, 454 F.2d 1124, 1128 (9th Cir.) (attitudes toward drug users, political ac…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Barlow
See, e.g., United States v. Gaultney, 581 F.2d 1137 , 1143 n. 4 (5th Cir.1978) ("[Abandonment of vehicles in public areas may ... present sufflcient exigency to dispense with-a warrant.”), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 259 (1980). 3 .The plea also predated the January 1, 1966, effectiveness date of Tex.Code Crim.P. art. 26.16, which imposed various Boykin-like admonishment requirements.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stanford Smith A/K/A Willie Ellis Eveleigh
(2×)
United States v. Merchant Diamond Group, Inc., 565 F.2d 252, 253 (2d Cir.1977) (per curiam) (collecting cases); see also United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 152 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. William N. Logan, Jr. And Eddie Stanley
See United States v. Morris, 477 F.2d 657 (5th Cir.) (denying motion to suppress) (footnote omitted), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 852 , 94 S.Ct. 146 , 38 L.Ed.2d 101 (1973); id. at 663 (“A warrantless arrest is nevertheless valid if the arresting officer has probable cause to believe that the person arrested has committed or is in the act of committing a crime.”); see also United States v. Gaultney, 581 F.2d 1137, 1146-48 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 259 (1980) (reversing suppression of evidence where entry of house and subsequent arrest met constitut…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Gotchis
Leak v. Follette, 418 F.2d 1266 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1050 , 90 S.Ct. 1388 , 25 L.Ed.2d 665 (1970)); see also United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 148 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980); United States v. Lipton, 467 F.2d 1161, 1168-69 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 927 , 93 S.Ct. 1358 , 35 L.Ed.2d 587 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gomez
See, e.g., United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 147 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980); United States v. Magnano, 543 F.2d 431, 437 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1091 , 97 S.Ct. 1101 , 51 L.Ed.2d 536 (1977); United States v. Tramunti, 513 F.2d 1087, 1105 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 832 , 96 S.Ct. 54 , 46 L.Ed.2d 50 (1975).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Gomberg, United States of America v. Harold Levy, United States of America v. Michelle D'amico, United States of America v. Albert Spielvogel, United States of America v. Joseph Disantis, Jr.
See, e.g., United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 156 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gomberg
See, e.g., United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 156 (2d Cir.1979), cert, denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Concepcion Rubio, A/K/A \Carol Rubio
In both Braver and the instant case, the instruction given merely conveyed to the jury the law of this circuit that the use of undercover agents and informers is not an unlawful practice and should not distract its attention from the two factual questions which it must decide: “(1) did the agent induce the accused to commit the offence charged in the indictment; (2) if so, was the accused ready and willing without persuasion and was he awaiting any propitious opportunity to commit the offence.” United States v. Sherman, 200 F.2d 880, 882 (2d Cir.1952); see also United States v. Barnes, 604…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Earl Bowe
See also United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121, 152-53 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mark Steven Phillips and Richard Elliott Grant, Jr., United States of America v. Robert Jay Meinster, A/K/A \Robby\"
See, e. g., United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121 , 134 n.3 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980) (citing cases in which intensified security measures were implemented as a result of attempts to influence, intimidate or threaten witnesses or jurors in narcotics cases) 32 See United States v. Meinster, 481 F.Supp. 1119 (S.D.Fla.1979) 33 At one point in the hearing an FBI agent testified about conversations which occurred in meetings between a government operative and certain defendants: THE WITNESS: Well, sir, during the meetings that I am aware of …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Phillips
See, e. g., United States v. Barnes, 604 F.2d 121 , 134 n.3 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 907 , 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 260 (1980) (citing cases in which intensified security measures were implemented as a result of attempts to influence, intimidate or threaten witnesses or jurors in narcotics cases). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gay v. Waiters
See, e. g., Scheriff v. Beck, 452 F.Supp. 1254 (D.Colo.1978); Dual v. Cleland, 79 F.R.D. 696 (D.D.C.1978); Mr. Hanger, Inc. v. Cut Rate Plastic Hangers, Inc., 63 F.R.D. 607 (E.D.N.Y.1974); Staffend v. Lake Central Airlines, Inc., 47 F.R.D. 218 (N.D.Ohio 1969); see also August v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 600 F.2d 699 (7th Cir. 1979), (award of costs not mandatory if the offer was not in good faith) cert, granted, - U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 1833 , 64 L.Ed.2d 259 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
v.
August
v.
August
No. 79-814.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 21, 1980.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted.