green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
4.1 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1992 ·
…he first amendment right of competitors to join in petitioning courts and administrative bodies entails the right to band together for purposes of supporting litigation.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Mcguire Oil Company v. Mapco, Inc.
he first amendment right of competitors to join in petitioning courts and administrative bodies entails the right to band together for purposes of supporting litigation.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
McGuire Oil Co. v. Mapco, Inc.
he first amendment right of competitors to join in petitioning courts and administrative bodies entails the right to band together for purposes of supporting litigation.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Football League v. National Football League
(2×)
See Feminist Women’s Health Center, Inc. v. Mohammad, 586 F.2d 530 , 543 n. 7 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 262 , 62 L.Ed.2d 180 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Patterson v. Aiken
See Feminist Women’s Health Center v. Mohammad, 586 F.2d 530 (5th Cir.1978), rehearing denied, 591 F.2d 1343 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 262 , 62 L.Ed.2d 180 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Pumpkin Air, Inc. v. City of Addison
See generally Feminist Women’s Health Center v. Mohammad, 586 F.2d 530, 542 (5th Cir.1978), ce rt. denied, 444 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 262 , 62 L.Ed.2d 180 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
City of Cleveland v. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company
(2×)
See City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co., 538 F.Supp. 1257, 1278-79 (N.D.Ohio 1981) ("To adopt the City's position would emasculate and indeed gut the constitutional protection afforded under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine and have a 'chilling effect' upon the exercise of First Amendment rights.") While I am aware that another court has apparently adopted a similar approach, see Feminist Women's Health Center v. Mohammad, 586 F.2d 530 , 543 n. 7 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 262 , 62 L.Ed.2d 180 (1979), I do not believe that this was the test laid do…
discussed
Cited "see"
First American Title Co. v. South Dakota Land Title Ass'n
See Feminist Women’s Health Center, Inc. v. Mohammad, 586 F.2d 530 (5th Cir. 1978) cert. denied 444 U.S. 924 , *1159 100 S.Ct. 262 , 62 L.Ed.2d 180 (1979); Technicon Medical Information Systems Corp. v. Green Bay Packaging, Inc., 480 F.Supp. 124 (E.D.Wis.1979); Colorado Petroleum Marketers Ass’n v. Southland Corp., 476 F.Supp. 373 (D.Colo.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society, an Arizona Non-Profit Corporation Maricopa Foundation for Medical Care, an Arizona Non-Profit Corporation Pima County Medical Society, an Arizona Non-Profit Corporation and Pima Foundation for Medical Care, an Arizona Non-Profit Corporation, State of Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society, an Arizona Non-Profit Corporation Maricopa Foundation for Medical Care, an Arizona Non-Profit Corporation and Pima Foundation for Medical Care, an Arizona Non-Profit Corporation
See United States v. Texas State Board of Public Accountancy, 464 F.Supp. 400, 402-03 (W.D.Tex.1978) (competitive bidding ban is per se illegal), aff'd, 592 F.2d 919 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 262 , 62 L.Ed.2d 180 (1979); Veizaga v. National Board for Respiratory Therapy, (1977-1) Trade Cases (CCH) P 61,274 (N.D.Ill.1977) (per se rule applied to commercial activity of a profession).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bond v. Cedar Rapids Television Co.
Missouri v. National Org. for Women, Inc., 620 F.2d 1301, 1316-17 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 842 , 101 S.Ct. 122 , 66 L.Ed.2d 49 (1980); Havoco of Am., Ltd. v. Hollobow, 702 F.2d 643 , 649-51 (7th Cir.1983); Surgidev Corp. v. Eye Technology, Inc., 625 F.Supp. 800, 803 (D.Minn.1986); see also Feminist Women’s Health Center, Inc. v. Mohammad, 586 F.2d 530, 551 (5th Cir.1978) (petitioning activity protected from state law liability as well as federal antitrust liability), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 262 , 62 L.Ed.2d 180 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ott v. St. Luke Hospital of Campbell County, Inc.
Pa.1979) (privilege similar to that claimed herein denied in antitrust litigation); see also Feminist Women’s Health Center, Inc. v. Mohammad, M.D., 586 F.2d 530 (5th Cir. 1978), cert, den. 444 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 262 , 62 L.Ed.2d 180 (1979) (privilege for medical review committee records held inapplicable in trial of federal cause of action); Crawford v. Dominic, 469 F.Supp. 260 (E.D.Pa.1979) (civil rights police brutality action, investigative reports and supervisor’s evaluations of police department denied privilege); United States v. King, 73 F.R.D. 103 (E.D.N.Y.1976) (claim of privil…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.
See also Feminist Women’s Health Center v. Mohammad, 586 F.2d 530, 543 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 262 , 62 L.Ed.2d 180 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ervin C. Palmer and Gloria M. Palmer, Husband and Wife, and Tim Palmer v. Roosevelt Lake Log Owners Association, Inc.
See also Feminist Women’s Health Center, Inc. v. Mohammad, 586 F.2d 530 , 539—41 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 924 , 100 S.Ct. 262 , 62 L.Ed.2d 180 (1979) (substantial impact on commerce where an abortion clinic purchased $4,000 or $5,000 worth of out-of-state supplies a year and received $12,000 worth of yearly business from out-of-state patients); Optivision, Inc. v. Syracuse Shopping Ctr.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Community Communications Company, Inc. v. City of Boulder, Colorado
See e. g., United States v. Texas Board of Public Accountancy, 464 F.Supp. 400 (W.D.Tex.1978), aff'd per curiam, 592 F.2d 919 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 925 , 100 S.Ct. 262 , 62 L.Ed.2d 180 (1979) (no immunity, prohibiting accountants from competitive bidding was neither directed by nor within contemplation of state Accountancy Act, authorizing rules for maintaining high standards for accountants); Mason City Center Associates v. City of Mason City, 468 F.Supp. 737 (N.D.Iowa 1979) (no immunity, anticompetitive agreement in exercise of city's zoning power was not within direction or con…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Texas State Board of Public Accountancy
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 78-1811.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 29, 1979.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.