discussed Cited "see" Southwest Diversified, Inc. v. City of Brisbane See Furey v. City of Sacramento, 24 Cal.3d 862, 865-66 , 157 Cal.Rptr. 684 , 598 P.2d 844 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 976 , 100 S.Ct. 476 , 62 L.Ed.2d 403 (1979) (Without discussing vested rights, the court held that a city was estopped from amending its general plan where it had participated with other public entities to create an assessment district, annexed the land affected by the district, and then attempted to amend the general plan so as to deprive an assessed taxpayer of the benefit the assessment had purchased); Billings v. California Coastal Commission, 103 Cal.App.3d 729, 735 , 163 Cal…

discussed Cited "see" Lawrence E. Furey, Trustee v. City of Sacramento, a Chartered City, County of Sacramento and Natomas Sanitation District of Sacramento County (2×) See Fu-rey v. City of Sacramento, 24 Cal.3d 862, 875-76 , 157 Cal.Rptr. 684, 691-92 , 598 P.2d 844, 851-52 , cert. denied, 444 U.S. 976 , 100 S.Ct. 476 , 62 L.Ed.2d 403 (1979).