green
Positive treatment
8.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
M. W. Holloway v. Clay E. McElroy Warden
(2×)
But see Reese v. Wainwright, 600 F.2d 1085, 1089-90 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 410 (1979) (applying Jackson standard without reservation to pre-Jackson conviction); Llewellyn v. Stynchcombe, 609 F.2d 194, 196 (5th Cir. 1980) (same).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Itt Rayonier, Incorporated
But see, Sinicropi v. Nassau County, 601 F.2d 60 (2d *1002 Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 488 , 62 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979) (Title VII suit barred when issues decided adversely to plaintiff in prior state proceeding).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re \Agent Orange\" Prod. Liability Litig."
See Sinicropi v. Nassau County, 601 F.2d 60 , 62 23 (2d Cir. 1979) (concluding that even if district court had erred 24 in denying motion to amend, any error would be harmless because 25 the proposed amendment would have been barred by res judicata), 26 cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 (1979); cf. Unlaub Co., Inc. v. -55- 1 Sexton, 568 F.2d 72, 78 (8th Cir. 1977) (concluding any abuse of 2 discretion by district court in failing to permit defendant to 3 amend his answer was harmless because "[n]one of the matters set 4 forth in the proposed amended answer would affect the result"). 5 CONCLUSION 6 Fo…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re \Agent Orange\" Prod. Liability Litig."
See Sinicropi v. Nassau County, 601 F.2d 60 , 62 25 (2d Cir. 1979) (concluding that even if district court had erred 26 in denying motion to amend, any error would be harmless because -55- 1 the proposed amendment would have been barred by res judicata), 2 cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 (1979); cf. Unlaub Co., Inc. v. 3 Sexton, 568 F.2d 72, 78 (8th Cir. 1977) (concluding any abuse of 4 discretion by district court in failing to permit defendant to 5 amend his answer was harmless because "[n]one of the matters set 6 forth in the proposed amended answer would affect the result"). 7 CONCLUSION 8 For …
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Agent Orange\ Product Liability Litigation"
See Sinicropi v. Nassau County, 601 F.2d 60, 62 (2d Cir.1979) (concluding that even if district court had erred in denying motion to amend, any error would be harmless because the proposed amendment would have been barred by res judicata ), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 488 , 62 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979); cf. Unlaub Co., Inc. v. Sexton, 568 F.2d 72, 78 (8th Cir. 1977) (concluding any abuse of discretion by district court in failing to permit defendant to amend his answer was harmless because "[n]one of the matters set forth in the proposed amended answer would affect the result").
discussed
Cited "see"
Twinam v. Dow Chemical Co.
See Sinicropi v. Nassau County, 601 F.2d 60, 62 (2d Cir.1979) (concluding that even if district court had erred in denying motion to amend, any error would be harmless because the proposed amendment would have been barred by res judicata), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 488 , 62 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979); cf. Unlaub Co., Inc. v. Sexton, 568 F.2d 72, 78 (8th Cir.1977) (concluding any abuse of discretion by district court in failing to permit defendant to amend his answer was harmless because “[n]one of the matters set forth in the proposed amended answer would affect the result”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson v. Johnson
(2×)
See Reese v. Wainwright, 600 F.2d 1085, 1093 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 410 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harry Nicks v. United States
(2×)
See Reese v. Wainwright, 600 F.2d 1085, 1092 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 410 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alonzo Day
(2×)
See Collins v. Housewright, 664 F.2d 181 , 183 n. 6 (8th Cir.1981) (per curiam) (quoting Reese v. Wainwright, 600 F.2d 1085, 1093 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 410 (1979)) (stating one "cannot fault a trial judge for failing to determine a question that he has no reason to believe is in issue”), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1004 , 102 S.Ct. 1639 , 71 L.Ed.2d 872 (1982). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Evelyn Deloris Bray v. New York Life Insurance
Accord Sinicropi v. Nassau Cty., 601 F.2d 60 , 62 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (where adverse determination of plaintiff’s discrimination claim by the NYSDHR and the *63 New York State Human Rights Appeals Board was affirmed by the New York Appellate Division, Title YII claim barred by res judicata), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 488 , 62 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Patrick David Currey
See Carey v. Leverette, 605 F.2d 745 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 (1978); Walters v. Harris, 460 F.2d 988 (4th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1129 (1973).
discussed
Cited "see"
Holmes v. State
(2×)
See Reese v. Wainwright, 600 F.2d 1085 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 410 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marvin Lyle Maples, Sr.
The district court denied the motion for mistrial but instructed the jury to disregard the witness’s testimony about appellant’s threats to kill her and himself. “[T]he decision whether a trial has been so tainted by prejudicial testimony that a mistrial should be declared lies within the discretion of the district court.” United States v. Reed, 724 F.2d 677, 679-80 (8th Cir.1984); see United States v. Taylor, 603 F.2d 732, 736 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 410 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Baraban
(2×)
See Reese v. Wainwright, 600 F.2d 1085, 1092 (5th Cir. 1979) (placing significance on defense counsel’s expressed belief that defendant was competent), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 410 (1979); United States v. Clark, 617 F.2d 180, 186 (9th Cir.1980) (placing significance on defense counsel’s failure to move for competency hearing during trial).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Laurence M. Anderson, United States of America v. Adrian Volk, United States of America v. Robert Lee Johnson
See United States v. Taylor, 603 F.2d 732, 734 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 487 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. State
(2×)
See Reese v. Wainwright, 600 F.2d 1085 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 410 (1979); Adkins v. State, 330 So.2d 809 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Alvord v. Wainwright
(2×)
See Reese v. Wainwright, 600 F.2d 1085, 1090-92 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 410 (1979); Greenfield v. Gunn, 556 F.2d 935 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 928 , 98 S.Ct. 413 , 54 L.Ed.2d 288 (1977).
examined
Cited "see"
United States of America Ex Rel. Clarence Rivers v. Gayle M. Franzen and Tyrone Fahner
(6×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Reese v. Wainwright, 600 F.2d 1085, 1094 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 410 (1979). *500 A significant factor upon which the district court did not remark was the failure of Rivers’ counsel to raise any question of competency during trial.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael O. Farber
See United States v. Taylor, 603 F.2d 732, 735 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 487 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Duane Earl Pope v. Charles Thone, Governor Paul Douglas, Attorney General and Jerry Bolin, Superintendent of Institutions
United States v. Wheeler, 435 U.S. 313, 317 , 98 S.Ct. 1079 [1082], 55 L.Ed.2d 303 (1978); Rinaldi v. United States, 434 U.S. 22, 28 , 98 S.Ct. 81 [84], 54 L.Ed.2d 207 (1977); Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U.S. 121, 132 , 79 S.Ct. 676 [682], 3 L.Ed.2d 684 (1959); Abbate v. United States, supra, 359 U.S. at 194 [ 79 S.Ct. at 670 ]____ United States v. Brown, 604 F.2d 557, 559 (8th Cir. 1979); see United States v. Taylor, 603 F.2d 732, 734 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 410 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jorge Acosta v. R. v. Turner, Superintendent, Glades Correctional Institution
(2×)
See Reese v. Wainwright, 600 F.2d 1085, 1089-90 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 410 (1979) (accord, under similar facts); United States v. Alvarez, 458 F.2d 1343, 1344 (5th Cir. 1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Moore v. Bonner
See, Sinicropi v. Nassau County, 601 F.2d 60, 62 (2d Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 488 , 62 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979); Gear v. City of Des Moines, 514 F.Supp. 1218, 1224 (S.D.Iowa 1981). 8 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Silver v. Mohasco Corp.
Id. pp. 462-463, 476, 102 S.Ct. pp. 1887-88, 1894; see also Sinicropi v. Nassau County, 601 F.2d 60 (2d Cir.1979), cert. den., 444 U.S. 983 , 100 S.Ct. 488 , 62 L.Ed.2d 411 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John Phillip Heater
See, e.g., United States v. Taylor, 603 F.2d 732, 735-36 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 410 (1979); United States v. Aaron, 553 F.2d 43 (8th Cir. 1977); United States v. Klein, 546 F.2d 1259, 1263 (5th Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. J. P. Reed
See also United States v. Taylor, 603 F.2d 732 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 982 , 100 S.Ct. 487 , 62 L.Ed.2d 487 (1979); United States v. Tempesta, 587 F.2d 931 (8th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 910 , 99 S.Ct. 2005 , 60 L.Ed.2d 380 (1979); United States v. Stacey, 571 F.2d 440 (8th Cir. 1978).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reese
v.
Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida
v.
Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida
No. 79-5476.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 1979.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.