green
Positive treatment
3.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Messimer
See United States v. Moore, 599 F.2d 310, 314 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1024 , 100 S.Ct. 687 , 62 L.Ed.2d 658 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Ellender v. Schweiker
See Swift v. Toia, 450 F.Supp. 983 (S.D.N.Y.1978), aff’d, Swift v. Blum, 598 F.2d 312 (2nd Cir.1979), cert. den., Blum v. Swift, 444 U.S. 1025 , 100 S.Ct. 687 , 62 L.Ed.2d 658 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Robert D. Blair v. United States of America, Charles L. Moore v. United States of America, William G. Dodds, Jr. v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Moore, 599 F.2d 310, 315 (9th Cir. 1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1024 , 100 S.Ct. 687 , 62 L.Ed.2d 658 (1980). [n]o limitation shall be placed on the information concerning the background, character, and conduct of a person convicted of an offense which a court of the United States may receive and consider for the purpose of imposing an appropriate sentence.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Patrick Addis v. Gerald Whitburn, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
Id. at 1224 (citation omitted); see also Swift v. Toia, 461 F.Supp. 578, 581-82 (S.D.N.Y.1978), aff 'd. & adopted, 598 F.2d 312 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1025 , 100 S.Ct. 687 , 62 L.Ed.2d 658 (1980).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Lucas
See also United States v. Moore, 599 F.2d 310 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1024 , 100 S.Ct. 687 , 62 L.Ed.2d 658 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Wayne Barker, United States of America v. William Bernard McKinney United States of America v. Jeffrey Martin Engle, United States of America v. George Leland Timmons, Iii, United States of America v. Jason Engle
Indeed, perhaps paramount among the purposes of punishment is the desire to deter similar misconduct by others. 10 This doctrine, commonly called "general deterrence," 11 boasts an impressive lineage, 12 was long-recognized at common law, 13 and continues to command "near unanimity ... among state and federal jurists...." United States v. Bergman, 416 F.Supp. 496, 499 (S.D.N.Y.1976) (Frankel, J.); see also United States v. Moore, 599 F.2d 310, 315 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1024 , 100 S.Ct. 687 , 62 L.Ed.2d 658 (1980); United States v. Elliott, 674 F.2d 754, 756 (8th Cir.1982); Uni…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Barker
Indeed, perhaps paramount among the purposes of punishment is the desire to deter similar misconduct by others. 10 This doctrine, commonly called “general deterrence,” 11 boasts an impressive lineage, 12 was long-recognized at common law, 13 and continues to command “near unanimity ... among state and federal jurists____” United States v. Bergman, 416 F.Supp. 496, 499 (S.D.N.Y.1976) (Frankel, J.); see also United States v. Moore, 599 F.2d 310, 315 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1024 , 100 S.Ct. 687 , 62 L.Ed.2d 658 (1980); United States v. Elliott, 674 F.2d 754, 756 (8th Cir.19…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Judy Marietta Castello
See also United States v. Moore, 599 F.2d 310, 314 (9th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1024 , 100 S.Ct. 687 , 62 L.Ed.2d 658 (1980) (declarations in open court carry a strong presumption of verity).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Blum, Commissioner, Department of Social Services of New York
v.
Swift
v.
Swift
No. 79-101.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1980.
444 U.S. 1025
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of respondents for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.