green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.8 score
“rule 609(a) limits the balancing test to determining prejudicial effect to the defendant.”
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Tussel v. Witco Chemical Corp.
rule 609(a) limits the balancing test to determining prejudicial effect to the defendant.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bedney v. United States
(2×)
See Henson v. United States, 399 A.2d 16, 20 (D.C.), cert, denied, 444 U.S. 848 , 100 S.Ct. 96 , 62 L.Ed.2d 62 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Turner v. Travelers Insurance Co.
See Henson v. United States, 399 A.2d 16, 20 (D.C.) (“courts in this jurisdiction generally define ‘felony’ as any offense for which the maximum penalty provided for the offense is imprisonment for more than one year”), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 848 , 100 S.Ct. 96 , 62 L.Ed.2d 62 (1979).
examined
Cited "see"
Arthur Nathaniel Aiken v. James Spalding, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary, and Ken Eikenberry, Attorney General, State of Washington
(4×)
See Lerma v. Estelle, 585 F.2d 1297, 1300, n.3 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 848 , 100 S.Ct. 95 , 62 L.Ed.2d 62 (1979) (Rubin, J., dissenting) (petition alleging prison grievance denied for failure to exhaust state administrative remedies).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Waite
In light of all the circumstances, and particularly considering the unknown nature of the confidential information that the mother had provided and the concomitant difficulty of predicting its potential impact upon the trial, disqualification of this counsel was “a proper exercise of [County Court’s] broad discretion” (People v Robinson, 121 AD3d at 1180 ; see People v Watson, 26 NY3d at 625-626 ; People v Carncross, 14 NY3d at 330 ; People v Gordon, 272 AD2d 133, 134 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 890 [2000]; see also People v Hall, 46 NY2d 873, 874-875 [1979], cert denied 444 US 848 [1979])…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Emmanus
The defendant’s contention that the sentencing court improperly considered charges of which he was acquitted as a basis for imposing sentence is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]), and, in any event, is without merit (see People v Robinson, 250 AD2d 629 ; see also People v Hall, 46 NY2d 873, 875 , cert denied 444 US 848 ).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph D. Chavez
See, e.g., United States v. *1299 Erb, 596 F.2d 412, 419 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 848 , 100 S.Ct. 97 , 62 L.Ed.2d 63 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lackey v. State
(2×)
See also, United States v. Erb, 596 F.2d 412 (10th Cir. 1979), cert. denied 444 U.S. 848 , 100 S.Ct. 97 , 62 L.Ed.2d 63 (1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Luis Carino
See, e.g., United States v. Nevitt, 563 F.2d 406, 408 (9th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 847 , 100 S.Ct. 95 , 62 L.Ed.2d 61 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lerma
v.
Estelle, Corrections Director
v.
Estelle, Corrections Director
No. 78-6611.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1979.
Published
Citer courts: W.D. Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.