green
Positive treatment
6.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnny L. Bakker, Teresa Bakker, Carrie Ann Bakker v. Laura J. McKinnon
"To show willful noncompliance with the FCRA, [the plaintiff] must show that [the defendant] `knowingly and intentionally committed an act in conscious disregard for the rights of others,' but need not show `malice or evil motive.'" Cushman v. Trans Union Corp., 115 F.3d 220, 226 (3d Cir.1997), citing Philbin v. Trans Union Corp., 101 F.3d 957, 970 (3d Cir.1996) (citing Pinner v. Schmidt, 805 F.2d 1258, 1263 (5th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1022 , 107 S.Ct. 3267 , 97 L.Ed.2d 766 (1987)); accord Thornton v. Equifax, Inc., 619 F.2d 700, 705 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct…
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnny L. Bakker v. Laura J. McKinnon
“To show willful noncompliance with the FCRA, [the plaintiff] must show that [the defendant] ‘knowingly and intentionally committed an act in conscious disregard for the rights of others,’ but need not show ‘malice or evil motive.’” Cushman v. Trans Union Corp., 115 F.3d 220, 226 (3d Cir. 1997), citing Philbin v. Trans Union Corp., 101 F.3d 957, 970 (3d Cir. 1996) (citing Pinner v. Schmidt, 805 F.2d 1258, 1263 (5th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1022 (1987)); accord Thornton v. Equifax, Inc., 619 F.2d 700, 705 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harper v. TRW, INC.
See, Thornton v. Equifax, Inc., 619 F.2d 700 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980) (state common law defamation action preempted at least to extent that a qualified immunity protects the reporting agency).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nikou v. INB National Bank
See Thornton v. Equifax, Inc. (8th Cir.1980), 619 F.2d 700, 705 ("[Llocal law applies only to matters of practice and procedure, but substantive rights created by the Act are controlled by federal law and are not subject to 50 different rules of interpretation.") cert. denied (1980), 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Arcila v. State
(2×)
See, Juarez, supra at 781 , citing United States v. Rodriguez, 585 F.2d 1234 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980), and United States v. Wellins, 654 F.2d 550 (9th Cir. 1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Laracuente v. Laracuente
See Thornton v. Equifax Inc., 619 F. 2d 700 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed. 2d 41 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mecca v. Gibraltar Corp. of America
See United States v. DeLillo, 620 F.2d 939, 947 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980); United States v. Levy, 578 F.2d 896, 900 (2d Cir.1978); Lifetime Siding, Inc. v. United States, 359 F.2d 657, 661 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 921 , 87 S.Ct. 233 , 17 L.Ed.2d 144 (1966).
discussed
Cited "see"
Juarez v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Rodriguez, 585 F.2d 1234, 1239, 1242 (5th Cir.1978), cert. den. 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980); United States v. Wellins, 654 F.2d 550, 555 (9th Cir.1981); see also Commonwealth v. Jackson, 459 Pa. 669 , 331 A.2d 189 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Sturm
See United States v. Sander, 615 F.2d 215, 218 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980) (government satisfies “its burden of proof if it show(s) circumstances surrounding the alleged extortionate conduct that rendered the victim’s fear of threatened loss reasonable.”).
discussed
Cited "see"
John Russell Thompson v. James A. Lynaugh, Interim Director, Texas Department of Corrections
See United States v. Rodriguez, 585 F.2d 1234, 1240-42 (5th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980); cf. Holland v. United States, 348 U.S. 121, 140 , 75 S.Ct. 127, 138 , 99 L.Ed. 150 (1954). 21 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nick Dipaolo, Edward Weather, and Paul Snyder (A/k/a \Dusty\")"
See United States v. DeLillo, 620 F.2d 939, 947-48 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980); see also 3A J.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lehr
See United States v. DeLillo, 620 F.2d 939 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 107 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980); United States v. Cirillo, 468 F.2d 1233 (2d Cir.1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 989 , 93 S.Ct. 1501 , 36 L.Ed.2d 188 (1973).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Milan Bagaric, Mile Markich, Ante Ljubas, Vinko Logarusic, Ranko Primorac, and Drago Sudar
See United States v. DeLillo, 620 F.2d 939, 947 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Parmley
See United States v. DeLillio, C.A.2d (1980), 620 F.2d 939, 947 [11], n. 2, certiorari denied (1980), 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 107 , 108, 66 L.Ed.2d 41 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Lawrence Wellins
See United States v. Rodriguez, 585 F.2d 1234, 1239, 1242 (5th Cir. 1978), cert. denied 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Haynes v. Navy Federal Credit Union
Avery v. United States, 534 F.Supp.2d 40, 42 (D.D.C.2008) (citations omitted); see also Thornton v. Equifax, Inc., 619 F.2d 700, 703 (8th Cir.) (“[N]o defamation or like actions are allowed under the [FCRA] unless malice or willful intent is alleged.”) (citation omitted), ce rt. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gibbs v. SLM Corp.
See, e.g., Thornton v. Equifax, Inc., 619 F.2d 700, 703 (8th Cir.) (§ 1681h(e) provides that “no defamation or like actions are allowed under the Act unless malice or willful intent is alleged”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980); Yeager v. TRW Inc., 984 F.Supp. 517, 522, 524 (E.D.Tex.1997) (summary judgment granted on claims for which defendant lacked the requisite intent and did not act with “malice or willful intent”); Mitchell v. Surety Acceptance Corp., 838 F.Supp. 497, 501 (D.Colo.1993) (“No defamation [or negligence] action is allowed under the…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yeager v. TRW INC.
See, e.g, Thornton v. Equifax, 619 F.2d 700, 705 (8th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980) (defining the term malice); Wiggins v. Equifax Services, Inc. 848 F.Supp. 213, 219 (D.D.C.1993) (citing Stevenson v. TRW, Inc., 987 F.2d 288, 293 (5th Cir.1993)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lema v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.
See e.g., Thornton v. Equifax, Inc., 619 F.2d 700 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980); Grant v. TRW, Inc., 789 F.Supp. 690 (D.Md.1992) (Motz, J.).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Whelan v. Trans Union Credit Reporting Agency
See, e.g., Thornton v. Equifax, Inc., 619 F.2d 700, 705 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980); Wiggins, 848 F.Supp. at 223 & n. 17.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Patrick Henry Martinez
See e.g., United States v. Sander, 615 F.2d 215 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980) (purchase of out-of-state products sufficient interstate nexus); United States v. Richard, 9 F.3d 102 (5th Cir.1993) (unpublished opinion) (temporary closure of store following robbery sufficient interference with interstate commerce). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Stephen B. Zackson and Henry Acierno, Peter Lagatta
See, e.g., United States v. DeLillo, 620 F.2d 939, 946 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 107 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980); United States v. Peterman, 841 F.2d 1474 , 1479 & n. 3 (10th Cir.1988) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1004 , 109 S.Ct. 783 , 102 L.Ed.2d 774 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mirocha v. TRW, INC.
See, e.g., Thornton v. Equifax, Inc., 619 F.2d 700, 703 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980) (noting that “no defamation or like actions are allowed under the [FCRA] unless malice or willful intent is alleged.”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Turecek
See also United States v. DeLillo, 620 F.2d 939, 946 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 107 , 108, 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1981); United States v. Morlang, 531 F.2d 183, 190 (4th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Waldbaum, Inc.
See e.g., United States v. DeLillo, 620 F.2d 939, 948 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980) (petit jury); United States v. Brown, 540 F.2d 364 (8th Cir.1976) (petit jury); United States v. Russo, 480 F.2d 1228, 1244 (6th Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1157 , 94 S.Ct. 915 , 39 L.Ed.2d 109 (1974) (petit jury).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anderson
See also United States v. DeLillo, 620 F.2d 939, 946 (2d Cir.) (“[T]he balance between probativeness and prejudice will differ according to the purposes for which a piece of evidence is to be admitted.”), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 , 101 S.Ct. 108 , 66 L.Ed.2d 41 (1980); United States v. Check, 582 F.2d 668, 685-86 (2d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Stern v. Credit Bureau of Milwaukee
See, e.g., Thornton v. Equifax, Inc., 619 F.2d 700 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 835 (1980); Hauser v. Equifax, Inc., 602 F2d 811 (8th Cir 1979).
Independent Order of Foresters
v.
Bier
v.
Bier
No. 79-1924.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Published
Super. Ct. Cal., County of Los Angeles. Certiorari denied.