green
Positive treatment
7.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
State v. Gibbons
But see United States v. Murzyn, 631 F.2d 525 (7th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1373 , 67 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981) (in prosecution for sale of stolen automobiles, evidence that defendant threatened a federal agent with a gun, solicited an assassin, made derogatory racial and sexual re *79 marks and stole from a nursery and construction site admissible to rebut claim of government coercion).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vargas v. United States
It is well established that § 2255 “may not be employed to relitigate questions which were raised and considered on direct appeal.” Barton v. United States, 791 F.2d 265, 267 (2d Cir.1986) (per curiam); accord United States v. Sanin, 252 F.3d 79, 83 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (citing cases), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 122 S.Ct. 492 , 151 L.Ed.2d 403 (2001). “ ‘Reconsideration is permitted only where there has been an intervening change in the law and the new law would have exonerated a defendant had it been in force before the conviction was affirmed on direct appeal.’” Sanin, 252 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Vargas v. United States
It is well established that § 2255 “may not be employed to relitigate questions which were raised and considered on direct appeal.” Barton v. United States, 791 F.2d 265, 267 (2d Cir.1986) (per curiam); accord United States v. Sanin, 252 F.3d 79, 83 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (citing cases), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 122 S.Ct. 492 , 151 L.Ed.2d 403 (2001). “ ‘Reconsideration is permitted only where there has been an intervening change in the law and the new law would have exonerated a defendant had it been in force before the conviction was affirmed on direct appeal.’ ” Sanin, 252…
discussed
Cited "see"
Rosario-Dominguez v. United States
It is well established that § 2255 “may not be employed to relitigate questions which were raised and considered on direct appeal.” Barton v. United States, 791 F.2d 265, 267 (2d Cir.1986) (per curiam); accord United States v. Sanin, 252 F.3d 79, 83 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (citing cases), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1008 , 122 S.Ct. 492 , 151 L.Ed.2d 403 (2001). “‘Reconsideration is permitted only where there has been an intervening change in the law and the new law would have exonerated a defendant had it been in force before the conviction was affirmed on direct appeal.’ ” Sanin, 252 …
cited
Cited "see"
Storrs v. Hughes Aircraft Co.
Accord United States v. Garner, 632 F.2d 758, 761-62 (9th Cir.1980) (decision appealed from must have actually terminated the proceedings), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Hector Gerardo Gutierrez-Zamarano
See United States v. Garner, 632 F.2d 758, 764 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1373 , 67 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carlos Cabrera v. United States
DISCUSSION As we have held previously, “section 2255 may not be employed to relitigate questions which were raised and considered on direct appeal.” Barton v. United States, 791 F.2d 265, 267 (2d Cir.1986) (per curiam); accord Chin v. United States, 622 F.2d 1090, 1092 (2d Cir.1980) (no relitigation permitted if issue already raised on direct appeal, absent intervening change of law which would change outcome), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 353 (1981); United States v. Natelli, 553 F.2d 5, 7 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (“once a matter has been decided adversely to a…
cited
Cited "see"
Hubbard v. Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
See Gurmankin v. Costanzo, 626 F.2d 1115 (3d Cir.1980) (back pay the norm, to make whole the victims of illegal discrimination), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Karen Eccles, Cross-Appellant
See United States v. Garner, 632 F.2d 758, 761-66 (9th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1373 , 67 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Leroy Emanuel Johnston, Jr. v. United States
See Chin v. United States, 622 F.2d 1090 (2nd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Word v. United States
See Chin v. United States, 622 F.2d 1090 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 353 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Meding v. Hurd
See Gurmankin v. Costanzo, 626 F.2d 1115, 1123 (3d Cir.1980), (back pay in § 1983 actions, just as in Title VII actions, is appropriately classified as an equitable remedy), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981); cf., Goss v. Exxon Office Systems, 747 F.2d 885, 890 (3d Cir.1984) (front pay should be regarded as an equitable remedy in Title VII cases).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ford v. Nicks
See Gurmankin v. Costanzo, 626 F.2d 1115, 1125 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981); Powell v. Syracuse University, 580 F.2d 1150, 1154 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 984 , 99 S.Ct. 576 , 58 L.Ed.2d 656 (1978); Faro v. NYU, 502 F.2d 1229, 1231 (2d Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ford v. Nicks
See Gurmankin v. Costanzo, 626 F.2d 1115, 1125 (3d Cir.1980), cert, denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981); Powell v. Syracuse University, 580 F.2d 1150, 1154 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 439 U.S. 984 , 99 S.Ct. 576 , 58 L.Ed.2d 656 (1978); Faro v. NYU, 502 F.2d 1229, 1231 (2d Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Billy G. Byers
See Chin v. United States, 622 F.2d 1090, 1092 (2d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 353 (1981); United States v. Natelli, 553 F.2d 5, 7 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 819 , 98 S.Ct. 59 , 54 L.Ed.2d 75 (1977). 85 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Randall Dale Dahlin
Id.; see United States v. Murzyn, 631 F.2d 525, 529 (7th Cir.1980) (balancing test involves inquiry into the relevance, reliability, and unfair effect of the evidence), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1373 , 67 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kolosky v. Anchor Hocking Corp.
See Gurmankin v. Costanzo, 626 F.2d 1115, 1121 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981) (Title VII is intended to eliminate the discriminatory effects of the past as well as bar like discrimination in the future); Rosen v. Public Service Electric and Gas Co., 477 F.2d 90, 95-96 (3d Cir.1973) (grant of authority under Title VII should be construed broadly and applied in a fashion that effectively terminates the discriminatory practice and makes the victim whole). 2 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Hou v. COM. OF PA., DEPT. OF EDUC.
Accord, Gurmankin v. Costanzo, 626 F.2d 1115, 1125 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981) (with regard to propriety of awarding tenure, courts must be careful not to intrude into the institutional determination with regard to evaluation of the tenure candidate).
cited
Cited "see"
Alaniz v. San Isidro Independent School District
See Gurmankin v. Costanzo, 626 F.2d 1115, 1120-21 (3rd Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert L. Russell
See United States v. Murzyn, 631 F.2d 525, 531 (7th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1373 , 67 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981); United States v. Conley, 523 F.2d 650, 655 (8th Cir.1975), cert. *1259 denied, 424 U.S. 920 , 96 S.Ct. 1125 , 47 L.Ed.2d 327 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert I. Bendis, Andrew D'amato, Armand Mucci
See United States v. Garner, 632 F.2d 758, 765 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1373 , 67 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Osborne
See United States v. Murzyn, 631 F.2d 525 (7th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1373 , 67 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981); United States v. Kelly, 569 F.2d 928 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 829 , 99 S.Ct. 105 , 58 L.Ed.2d 123 (1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nodleman v. Aero Mexico
See Gurmankin v. Costanzo, 556 F.2d 184 (3d Cir. 1977), further proceedings, 626 F.2d 1115 (3 Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981); King-Smith v. Aaron, 455 F.2d 378 (3d Cir. 1972); Upshur, 474 F.Supp. 332 ; Stubbs, 463 F.Supp. 110 ; see also Drennon, 428 F.Supp. 809 ; Frederick L. v. Thomas, 408 F.Supp. 832 (E.D.Pa.1976), aff’d, 557 F.2d 373 (3d Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. State of New Jersey
(2×)
The same standards under Title VII for liability and relief apply to both public and private employers, including liability for back pay awards, Dothard, 433 U.S. at 331 n.14, 97 S.Ct. at 2727; Association Against Discrimination ; see Gurmankin v. Costanzo, 626 F.2d 1115, 1124 (3d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981); and are therefore applicable to the City of Newark.
cited
Cited "see"
Thrasher v. Missouri State Highway Commission
See Gurmankin v. Costanzo, 556 F.2d 184, 186 (3d Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Wayne Franklin Traylor, Ardis May Traylor, and John Horace Andrews
See United States v. Sullivan, 625 F.2d 9, 13 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1374 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981). 2.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Curzi v. United States
See also Chin v. United States, 622 F.2d 1090, 1093 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 353 (1981); Pacelli v. United States, 588 F.2d 360, 362 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 441 U.S. 908 , 99 S.Ct. 2001 , 60 L.Ed.2d 378 (1979); Williams v. United States, 463 F.2d 1183 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 967 , 93 S.Ct. 299 , 34 L.Ed.2d 232 (1972), all applying the “deliberate bypass” standard to collateral review of constitutional claims not raised on direct appeal.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bennun v. Rutgers State University
See also Gurmankin v. Costanzo, 626 F.2d 1115, 1125 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doctor Alfred Bennun v. Rutgers State University Board of Governors of Rutgers State University and Doctor Edward J. Bloustein, President (Civil Rights No. 84-4655). Dr. Alfred Bennun v. Rutgers State University Board of Governors of Rutgers State University and Dr. Edward J. Bloustein, President, Rutgers State University (Civil Rights No. 85-3491). Dr. Alfred Bennun v. Rutgers State University (Civil Rights No. 86-621). Rutgers, the State University Board of Governors of Rutgers, the State University and Dr. Edward J. Bloustein
See also Gurmankin v. Costanzo, 626 F.2d 1115, 1125 (3d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1375 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981). 141 In the present case, it would appear that this court may have abandoned the doctrine of restraint set forth in Kunda.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Unruh
See, e.g., United States v. Sullivan, 625 F.2d 9 (4th Cir.1980), cert, denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1374 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981); United States v. Venema, 563 F.2d 1003 (10th Cir.1977); United States v. Bronstein, 521 F.2d 459 (2d Cir.1975), cert, denied, 424 U.S. 918 , 96 S.Ct. 1121 , 47 L.Ed.2d 324 (1976); People v. Mayberry, 31 Cal. 335 , 644 P.2d 810 , 182 Cal.Rptr. 617 (1982); State v. Wolohan, 23 Wash.App. 813 , 598 P.2d 421 (1979). .For commentary representative of this view, see, e.g., Comment, The Constitutionality of the Canine Sniff Search: From Katz to Dogs, 68 Marquette L.Rev.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Florida v. Royer
(2×)
See, e. g., United States v. Sullivan, 625 F. 2d 9, 13 (CA4 1980) (no search), cert. denied, 450 U. S. 923 (1981); United States v. Burns, 624 F. 2d 95, 101 (CA10 1980) (same); United States v. Beale, 674 F. 2d 1327, 1335 (CA9 1982) (sniff is an intrusion requiring reasonable suspicion), cert, pending, No. 82-674.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Franke Eugenio Martinez
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Sullivan, 625 F.2d 9 (4th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1374 , 67 L.Ed.2d 352 (1981); United States v. Bulgier, 618 F.2d 472 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 843 , 101 S.Ct. 125 , 66 L.Ed.2d 51 (1980); United States v. Walker, 601 F.2d 1051 (9th Cir. 1979); United States v. Woodruff, 596 F.2d 798 (8th Cir. 1979); United States v. Emens, 565 F.2d 1142 (9th Cir. 1977); United States v. St.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Adrian J. Short, Jr. Earl L. Riedel
See United States v. Wright, 622 F.2d 792, 794 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 961 , 101 S.Ct. 376 , 66 L.Ed.2d 229 (1980); but see United States v. Griffin, 617 F.2d 1342,1345 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 863 , 101 S.Ct. 167 , 66 L.Ed.2d 80 (1980); compare United States v. Garner, 632 F.2d 758, 765 (9th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 923 , 101 S.Ct. 1373 , 67 L.Ed.2d 351 (1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Murzyn
v.
United States and Hall v. United States
v.
United States and Hall v. United States
No. 80-1186; No. 80-5936.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 23, 1981.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 631 F. 2d 525.