green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.7 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"zoning provides one of the firmest and most basic of the rights of local control"
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dumas v. City of Dallas
zoning provides one of the firmest and most basic of the rights of local control
discussed
Cited "see"
Sabetti v. DiPaolo
See Stansberry v. Holmes, 613 F.2d 1285, 1289 (5th Cir.) (“A provision need not ... be cast in terms that are mathematically precise....”) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Crawford County
“The regulation of land use is traditionally a function performed by local governments.” Lake Country, 440 U.S. at 402 , 99 S.Ct. at 1177 ; see Grant v. County of Seminole, 817 F.2d 731, 736 (11th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (“ ‘Zoning provides one of the firmest and most basic of the rights of local control.’ ” (quoting Stansberry v. Holmes, 613 F.2d 1285, 1288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980))).
discussed
Cited "see"
Brown v. Crawford County
Crymes, 923 F.2d at 1485 . 31 "The regulation of land use is traditionally a function performed by local governments." Lake Country, 440 U.S. at 402 , 99 S.Ct. at 1177 ; see Grant v. County of Seminole, 817 F.2d 731, 736 (11th Cir.1987) (per curiam) (" 'Zoning provides one of the firmest and most basic of the rights of local control.' " (quoting Stansberry v. Holmes, 613 F.2d 1285, 1288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980))).
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. Copeland
See Stansberry v. Holmes, 613 F.2d 1285 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980).
cited
Cited "see"
Ard v. Ard
See Raisen v. Raisen, 379 So.2d 352 (Fla. 1979), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 111 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Willie James Brown v. Louie L. Wainwright, Etc.
(2×)
See Scott v. Wainwright, 617 F.2d 99 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 885 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 111 (1980); Chapman v. United States, 553 F.2d 886 (5th Cir. 1977).
cited
Cited "see"
Bergmann v. United States
See Naisbitt v. United States, 611 F.2d 1350, 1355 (10th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 885 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 111 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mayo v. State
See, e.g., Stansberry v. Holmes, 613 F.2d 1285, 1290 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980); State v. Garcia, 823 S.W.2d 793, 798-99 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1992, pet. ref'd); Schope v. State, 647 S.W.2d 675, 678-79 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1982, pet. ref'd); Memet v. State, 642 S.W.2d 518, 523 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1982, pet. ref'd).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hogan v. United States
Satterfield v. United States, 788 F.2d 395, 399-400 (6th Cir.1986); accord, Johnson by Johnson v. United States, 788 F.2d 845, 850 (2d Cir.1986) (“[w]e agree with the Chief Justice that the plain language of § 2680(h) prohibits claimants from clothing assault and battery actions in the garb of negligent failure to prevent the attack”); Garcia v. United States, 776 F.2d 116, 118 (5th Cir.1985); see also, Naisbitt v. United States, 611 F.2d 1350, 1353-54 (10th Cir.) cert. denied, 449 U.S. 885 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 111 (1980) (barring FTCA suit for negligent supervision).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jolar Cinema of Houston, Inc. v. City of Houston
See, e.g., Stansberry v. Holmes, 613 F.2d 1285 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 886 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 112 (1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carl Edwin Wiggins v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
See also Scott v. Wainwright, 617 F.2d 99, 104 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 885 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 111 (1980); and United States v. Dougherty, 473 F.2d 1113, 1127-30 (D.C.Cir.1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Louis Lyles v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, Respondent
See also Scott v. Wainwright, 617 F.2d 99, 102 (5th Cir. 1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 885 , 101 S.Ct. 240 , 66 L.Ed.2d 111 (1980).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Offender Rehabilitation of Florida
v.
Scott
v.
Scott
No. 80-257.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 1980.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: N.D. Texas (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.