green
Positive treatment
2.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1981 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1981
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Arbitration Between Dow Corning Corporation v. Safety National Casualty Corporation
See Int’l Produce, Inc. v. A/S Rosshavet, 638 F.2d 548, 551-52 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1017 , 101 S.Ct. 3006 , 69 L.Ed.2d 389 (1981) (maritime arbitration); Transit Cas.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lifecare International, Inc. v. CD Medical, Inc.
See Int’l Produce, Inc. v. A/S Rosshavet, 638 F.2d 548 , 551 n. 3 (2nd Cir.1981) (“It does not follow that an arbitrator’s personal feelings in favor of or against one attorney would necessarily be transferred to another attorney in the same firm.”), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1017 , 101 S.Ct. 3006 , 69 L.Ed.2d 389 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hartford Police Union v. Hartford, No. Cv93 070 46 64 (Apr. 13, 1995)
See International Produce, Inc. v. A/S Resshavet [Rosshavet] , 638 F.2d 548 (2d Cir.), cert. denied 451 U.S. 1017 , 101 S.Ct. 3006 , 69 L.Ed.2d 389 (1981); Morelife Construction Corporation v. New York City District Council Carpenters Benefit Funds , 748 F.2d 79 (2d.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re National Ass'n of Broadcast Employees & Technicians
See International Produce, Inc. v. A/S Rosshavet, 638 F.2d 548 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1017 , 101 S.Ct. 3006 , 69 L.Ed.2d 389 (1981); Andros Compania Maritima, S.A. v. Marc Rich & Co., A.G., 579 F.2d 691, 700 (2d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Florasynth, Inc. v. Alfred Pickholz
See International Produce v. A/S Rosshavet, 638 F.2d 548, 552 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1017 , 101 S.Ct. 3006 , 69 L.Ed.2d 389 (1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dahl v. English
See Frederiksen v. Poloway, 637 F.2d 1147 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1017 , 101 S.Ct. 3006 , 69 L.Ed.2d 389 (1981); Goodman v. Epstein, 582 F.2d 388 (7th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 939 , 99 S.Ct. 1289 , 59 L.Ed.2d 499 (1979); Hirk v. Agri-Research Council, Inc., 561 F.2d 96 (7th Cir.1977); see also Curran v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, 622 F.2d 216 (6th Cir.1980), aff'd on other grounds, 456 U.S. 353 , 102 S.Ct. 1825 , 72 L.Ed.2d 182 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Middlesex Mutual Insurance Company v. Stuart Levine
Compare Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co., 393 U.S. 145, 150 , 89 S.Ct. 337, 340 , 21 L.Ed.2d 301 (1968) (reasonable appearance of bias justifies vacating arbitration award) and Tamari v. Bache Halsey Stuart Inc., 619 F.2d 1196, 1200 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 873 , 101 S.Ct. 213 , 66 L.Ed.2d 93 (1980) (reasonable appearance of partiality) with International Produce, Inc. v. A/S Rosshavet, 638 F.2d 548, 551 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 1017 , 101 S.Ct. 3006 , 69 L.Ed.2d 389 (1981) (requiring clear, unexplained evidence of evident partiality).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Starr et ux.
v.
Pring
v.
Pring
No. 80-1613.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 26, 1981.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.